ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
Nwdps protocol - A simple functional outcome assessment tool for clubfoot correction and a review of literature.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting Paediatric Orthopaedics.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and traumaArticle
- Comparison of outcome of Ponseti method with traditional clubfoot treatment in children up to five years of age at tertiary care hospital.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVarious clubfoot severity scoring systems are known to us. Dimeglio and Pirani Scoring systems are most widely used. Also, various treatment outcome measures have been proposed by researchers to assess patient satisfaction and results of treatment. None of the available methods are widely popular and amenable for routine use. A "nwdps protocol" was proposed for functional assessment of patients with clubfoot correction, where "n" was
methodsThe nwdps protocol was applied to all the children at followup on a yearly basis who underwent clubfoot deformity correction in Department of Orthopaedics of our Institute between March 2016 and January 2018.
resultsEighty children were enrolled for the study, 45 had bilateral affection while 35 had unilateral affection. In all 125 feet were treated for clubfoot correction and evaluated using nwdps protocol. Each child was assessed by 2 researchers independently. There was no difference in functional assessment of 2 observers. Fifty-nine children were nwdp positive, one was nwps positive, while 2 were dwps positive at the end of 1 year. 79 children became nwdps positive at the end of 2nd year of followup.
conclusionNwdps protocol is a very easy to remember and easy to use functional outcome assessment tool post clubfoot correction with high degree of objectivity and interobserver reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.