Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099259›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2019

Factors Influencing the Presence of Papilla between Adjacent Implants and between a Tooth and an Implant.

Camila Agra Souza, Roberto Carlos Mourão Pinho, Rafael Amorim Cavalcanti de Siqueira, Alexia Luíse Freitas Santos de Andrade, Bruna de Carvalho Farias Vajgel, Joaquim Celestino da Silva Neto, Renata Cimões

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Papillary Reconstruction using Hyaluronic Acid: A Review.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camila Agra SouzaFederal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Roberto Carlos Mourão PinhoFederal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Rafael Amorim Cavalcanti de SiqueiraFederal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Alexia Luíse Freitas Santos de AndradeStudent Graduate Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Bruna de Carvalho Farias VajgelStudent Graduate Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Joaquim Celestino da Silva NetoUniversity of Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Renata CimõesFederal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Universidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim this study was to evaluate the factors that influence the presence or absence of the interproximal papilla between implants adjacent to the teeth or other implants, through clinical and radiographic evaluation. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe non-probabilistic sample comprised 44 patients of both genders aged between 21 and 68 years, rehabilitated with 114 osseointegrated implants. Through a retrospective clinical study, the patients were divided according to the presence or absence of the interproximal papilla: Group 1 - Absence of Papilla, Group 2 - Partial Presence of Papilla and Group 3 - Total Presence of Papilla. The success of the implants, the periodontal biotype, and the vertical and horizontal distances of the interproximal regions included in the study were evaluated.

resultsOf the 114 implants, 46.5% were considered unsuccessful, and bleeding was present in 29.8%. The periodontal biotype presented as thin and scalloped was found in 85.1% of the regions. The evaluation of the groups according to the confirmation of the interproximal space showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.007), with 61.9% of the wide and long interproximal spaces classified as Group 1, while 31% of the narrow and short interproximal spaces were classified as Group 3.

conclusionIt was concluded that the morphology of the interproximal space was the factor that was most strongly associated with the presence or absence of the interproximal papilla.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsEstheticsGingivaInter-dental Papilla

Identifiers

PMID32099259
PMCPMC6993469
OpenAlexW2997582522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.