Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099256›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2019

Dental Age Estimation based on Development Dental Atlas Assessment in a Child/Adolescent Population with Systemic Diseases.

Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Lucianna Maria Russell, Maria de Pádua Fernandes, Ricardo Henrique Alves da Silva, Rui Filipe Vargas de Sousa Santos

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dental age estimation in children that have undergone antineoplastic treatment.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2022
    Article
  10. Forensic determination of dental age by cementum thickness of human teeth.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Dental Age Assessment by IActa stomatologica Croatica · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristiana Palmela PereiraFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Lucianna Maria RussellFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Maria de Pádua FernandesFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Undergraduate Student, Dental Medicine.
Ricardo Henrique Alves da SilvaForensic Odontology, University of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Rui Filipe Vargas de Sousa SantosDepartment of Mathematics, School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTInstituto Politécnico de Leiria · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForensic estimation of chronological age has played an increasingly important role as part of cadaver identification, and also in living individuals due to the phenomenon of immigration and sexual abuse of undocumented trafficked children.

objectiveThis research aimed to validate the already used dental mineralization and eruption atlas in normal children and adolescent population in estimating chronological age in a young population, particularly those with special needs, majority of them with systemic diseases. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingA sample of 163 orthopantomograms from two independent medical institutions was collected from 133 patients aged between 4 and 23 years.

methodThe orthopantomograms were divided into two groups, 95 from patients with systemic pathologies that have repercussions on dental development and 68 with systemic pathologies without dental repercussions. Dental ages were estimated by the London Atlas using the left side and then independently the right side of the maxilla. The intraobserver and interobserver agreements were evaluated. The difference between dental age estimates and the chronological age and its absolute value were calculated and analyzed.

resultsStatistically significant differences were found between estimates and chronological age, revealing a general prevalence for underestimation; except for those under the age of 12. Nevertheless, the underestimation in individuals under the age of 16 was not significant (with an average of less than one month), while the underestimation was significant for persons who were at least 16 years old (with an average over 26 months). Furthermore, for those persons with systemic diseases with dental repercussions a greater error in underestimation was obtained, which indicates that the midpoint values should be reassessed in persons with Down's syndrome, chromosomal alterations, syndromes and central nervous system disorders.

conclusionsThis atlas can be potentially used as a tool for age estimation in a population with special needs and, also, in a population with systemic diseases, but we suggest further studies with larger international samples to create adequate atlases for all the required scenarios, mainly, diagrams for people with systemic diseases who are over the age of 16.

Indexed as

Forensic DentistryLegal Age EstimationOrthopantomographySystemic Diseases

Identifiers

PMID32099256
PMCPMC6993474
OpenAlexW2998205260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.