Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099190›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2020

Multi-target approaches to CNS repair: olfactory mucosa-derived cells and heparan sulfates.

Susan L Lindsay, George A McCanney, Alice G Willison, Susan C Barnett

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of Peptide CAQK: Properties, Applications, and Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Role of dendritic cells in spinal cord injury.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan L Lindsay *Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4241-4933
George A McCanney *Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alice G WillisonInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Susan C BarnettInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. susan.barnett@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-0575
University of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/592Chief Scientist Office ETM/439Chief Scientist Office TCS/19/22Medical Research Council MR/K014366/1Medical Research Council MR/R006237/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains one of the biggest challenges in the development of neuroregenerative therapeutics. Cell transplantation is one of numerous experimental strategies that have been identified and tested for efficacy at both preclinical and clinical levels in recent years. In this Review, we briefly discuss the state of human olfactory cell transplantation as a therapy, considering both its current clinical status and its limitations. Furthermore, we introduce a mesenchymal stromal cell derived from human olfactory tissue, which has the potential to induce multifaceted reparative effects in the environment within and surrounding the lesion. We argue that no single therapy will be sufficient to treat SCI effectively and that a combination of cell-based, rehabilitation and pharmaceutical interventions is the most promising approach to aid repair. For this reason, we also introduce a novel pharmaceutical strategy based on modifying the activity of heparan sulfate, an important regulator of a wide range of biological cell functions. The multi-target approach that is exemplified by these types of strategies will probably be necessary to optimize SCI treatment.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord RegenerationCell TransplantationChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansHeparan SulfateHeparan Sulfate ProteoglycansHeparinHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationNerve RegenerationNeurogliaOlfactory MucosaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsSpinal Cord InjuriesChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansHeparan SulfateHeparan Sulfate ProteoglycansHeparin

Identifiers

PMID32099190
OpenAlexW3007961792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.