Unlock ways to share data on peer review.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Possibilities for the peer review of interdisciplinary research: a small-scale qualitative study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026
   Article
2. Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025
   Article
3. Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews.PLoS biology · 2023
   Article
4. How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought.Learned publishing : journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers · 2023
   Article
5. Analysis of peer reviewers' response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 21 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023
   Article
6. Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
   Article
7. Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals.Royal Society open science · 2022
   Article
8. Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals.PeerJ · 2022
   Article
9. Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.PloS one · 2021
   Article
10. Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals.Science advances · 2021
    Article
11. Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports.eLife · 2020
    Article
12. The limitations to our understanding of peer review.Research integrity and peer review · 2020
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Hundreds of journals' editorial practices captured in database.2020

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as