Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099004›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The environment and species affect gut bacteria composition in laboratory co-cultured Anopheles gambiae and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes.

Sally A Saab, Heinrich Zu Dohna, Louise K J Nilsson, Piero Onorati, Johnny Nakhleh, Olle Terenius, Mike A Osta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insects · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification of anFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sally A SaabDepartment of Biology, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, Beirut, Lebanon.
Heinrich Zu DohnaDepartment of Biology, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, Beirut, Lebanon.
Louise K J NilssonDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7044, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Piero OnoratiDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7044, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johnny NakhlehDepartment of Biology, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, Beirut, Lebanon.
Olle TereniusDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7044, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. Olle.Terenius@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9909-1859
Mike A OstaDepartment of Biology, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, Beirut, Lebanon. mo07@aub.edu.lb.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The midgut microbiota of disease vectors plays a critical role in the successful transmission of human pathogens. The environment influences the microbiota composition; however, the relative mosquito-species contribution has not been rigorously disentangled from the environmental contribution to the microbiota structure. Also, the extent to which the microbiota of the adult sugar food source and larval water can predict that of the adult midgut and vice versa is not fully understood. To address these relationships, larvae and adults of Anopheles gambiae and Aedes albopictus were either reared separately or in a co-rearing system, whereby aquatic and adult stages of both species shared the larval water and sugar food source, respectively. Despite being reared under identical conditions, clear intra- and interspecies differences in midgut microbiota-composition were observed across seven cohorts, collected at different time points over a period of eight months. Fitting a linear model separately for each OTU in the mosquito midgut showed that two OTUs significantly differed between the midguts of the two mosquito species. We also show an effect for the sugar food source and larval water on the adult midgut microbiota. Our findings suggest that the mosquito midgut microbiota is highly dynamic and controlled by multiple factors.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsAnophelesBacteriaCoculture TechniquesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansLarvaMosquito VectorsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32099004
PMCPMC7042291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.