Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098912›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2020

X-Module: A novel fusion measure to associate co-expressed gene modules from condition-specific expression profiles.

Tulika Kakati, Dhruba K Bhattacharyya, Jugal K Kalita

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tulika KakatiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Tezpur University, Tezpur, Assam, India.
Dhruba K Bhattacharyya
Jugal K Kalita

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A gene co-expression network (CEN) is of biological interest, since co-expressed genes share common functions and biological processes or pathways. Finding relationships among modules can reveal inter-modular preservation, and similarity in transcriptome, functional, and biological behaviors among modules of the same or two different datasets. There is no method which explores the one-to-one relationships and one-to-many relationships among modules extracted from control and disease samples based on both topological and semantic similarity using both microarray and RNA seq data. In this work, we propose a novel fusion measure to detect mapping between modules from two sets of co-expressed modules extracted from control and disease stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) datasets. Our measure considers both topological and biological information of a module and is an estimation of four parameters, namely, semantic similarity, eigengene correlation, degree difference, and the number of common genes. We analyze the consensus modules shared between both control and disease stages in terms of their association with diseases. We also validate the close associations between human and chimpanzee modules and compare with the state-ofthe- art method. Additionally, we propose two novel observations on the relationships between modules for further analysis.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationTranscriptomeAlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsDatabases, GeneticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansPan troglodytesParkinson Disease

Identifiers

PMID32098912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.