ArticleJournal of biosciences2020
X-Module: A novel fusion measure to associate co-expressed gene modules from condition-specific expression profiles.
Article in Journal of biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A gene co-expression network (CEN) is of biological interest, since co-expressed genes share common functions and biological processes or pathways. Finding relationships among modules can reveal inter-modular preservation, and similarity in transcriptome, functional, and biological behaviors among modules of the same or two different datasets. There is no method which explores the one-to-one relationships and one-to-many relationships among modules extracted from control and disease samples based on both topological and semantic similarity using both microarray and RNA seq data. In this work, we propose a novel fusion measure to detect mapping between modules from two sets of co-expressed modules extracted from control and disease stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) datasets. Our measure considers both topological and biological information of a module and is an estimation of four parameters, namely, semantic similarity, eigengene correlation, degree difference, and the number of common genes. We analyze the consensus modules shared between both control and disease stages in terms of their association with diseases. We also validate the close associations between human and chimpanzee modules and compare with the state-ofthe- art method. Additionally, we propose two novel observations on the relationships between modules for further analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32098912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.