Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098898›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Combined therapy of photobiomodulation and adipose-derived stem cells synergistically improve healing in an ischemic, infected and delayed healing wound model in rats with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Roohollah Ebrahimpour-Malekshah, Abdollah Amini, Fatemeh Zare, Atarodsadat Mostafavinia, Samin Davoody, Niloofar Deravi, Mohammad Rahmanian, Seyed Mahmoud Hashemi, Malihe Habibi, Seyed Kamran Ghoreishi and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effect of composite biodegradable biomaterials on wound healing in diabetes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Roohollah Ebrahimpour-MalekshahDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abdollah AminiDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh ZareDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Atarodsadat MostafaviniaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Samin DavoodyDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Niloofar DeraviDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad RahmanianDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mahmoud HashemiDepartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Malihe HabibiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Kamran GhoreishiDepartment of Statistics, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.
Sufan ChienPrice Institute of Surgical Research, University of Louisville, and Noveratech LLC of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Sasha ShafikhaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Cancer Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Houssein AhmadiDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sahar BayatIllinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Mohammad BayatDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran bayat_m@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5214-4223
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Louisville · USIllinois Institute of Technology · USIslamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IRRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Qom · IR

Funding

A New Technique for Diabetic Foot UlcersR44DK105692 · NIDDK · NOVERATECH, LLC · PI CHIEN, SUFAN · 2016 to 2017
$1.5M
A new technique for diabetic foot ulcersR43DK105692 · NIDDK · NOVERATECH, LLC · PI CHIEN, SUFAN · 2015 to 2015
$275k
NIDDK NIH HHS R43 DK105692NIDDK NIH HHS R44 DK105692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe assessed the therapeutic effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) and adipose-derived stem cell (ADS) treatments individually and together on the maturation step of repairing of a delayed healing wound model in rats with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe randomly assigned 24 rats with DM1 to four groups (n=6 per group). Group 1 was the control (placebo) group. In group 2, allograft human ADSs were transplanted. Group 3 was subjected to PBM (wavelength: 890 nm, peak power output: 80 W, pulse frequency: 80 Hz, pulsed duration: 180 ns, duration of exposure for each point: 200 s, power density: 0.001 W/cm

resultsAll three treatment regimens significantly decreased the amount of microbial flora, significantly increased wound strength and significantly modulated inflammatory response and significantly increased angiogenesis on day 16. Microbiological analysis showed that PBM+ADS was significantly better than PBM and ADS alone. In terms of wound closure rate and angiogenesis, PBM+ADS was significantly better than the PBM, ADS and control groups.

conclusionsCombination therapy of PBM+ADS is more effective that either PBM or ADS in stimulating skin injury repair, and modulating inflammatory response in an MRSA-infected wound model of rats with DM1.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusWound HealingAdipose TissueAdultAllograftsAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIschemiaLow-Level Light TherapyMaleRatswound healing

Identifiers

PMID32098898
PMCPMC7206914
OpenAlexW3006723048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.