Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098731›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2020

Development and Internal Validation of a Web-based Tool to Predict Sexual, Urinary, and Bowel Function Longitudinally After Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation.

Aaron A Laviana, Zhiguo Zhao, Li-Ching Huang, Tatsuki Koyama, Ralph Conwill, Karen Hoffman, Michael Goodman, Ann S Hamilton, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Lisa E Paddock and 8 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Pelvic Radiation Disease.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk stratification tools in prostate cancer, where do we stand?Translational andrology and urology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Aaron A LavianaDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: aaron.a.laviana@vumc.org.
Zhiguo ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Li-Ching HuangDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Tatsuki KoyamaDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ralph ConwillOffice of Patient and Community Education, Patient Advocacy Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Karen HoffmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Center, Huston, TX, USA.
Michael GoodmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ann S HamiltonDepartment of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Xiao-Cheng WuDepartment of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Lisa E PaddockDepartment of Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Antoinette StroupDepartment of Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Matthew R CooperbergDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mia HashibeDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Brock B O'NeilDepartment of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Sherrie H KaplanDepartment of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Sheldon GreenfieldDepartment of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
David F PensonDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Daniel A BarocasDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Localized Prostate CancerR01HS019356 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PENSON, DAVID F. · 2010 to 2010
$7.6M
The Vanderbilt PCOR Career Knowledge, Education and Training ProgramK12HS022990 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PENSON, DAVID F. · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
10-year Comparative Effectiveness and Harms of Treatments for Prostate CancerR01CA230352 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROCAS, DANIEL A · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Comparative Effectiveness of Modern Therapies for Localized Prostate CancerR01HS022640 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PENSON, DAVID F. · 2013 to 2013
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022990AHRQ HHS R01 HS019356AHRQ HHS R01 HS022640NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision making to guide treatment of localized prostate cancer requires delivery of the anticipated quality of life (QOL) outcomes of contemporary treatment options (including radical prostatectomy [RP], intensity-modulated radiation therapy [RT], and active surveillance [AS]). Predicting these QOL outcomes based on personalized features is necessary.

objectiveTo create an easy-to-use tool to predict personalized sexual, urinary, bowel, and hormonal function outcomes after RP, RT, and AS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA prospective, population-based cohort study was conducted utilizing US cancer registries of 2563 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer in 2011-2012.

interventionPatient-reported urinary, sexual, and bowel function up to 5 yr after treatment. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patient-reported urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal function through 5 yr after treatment were collected using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. Comprehensive models to predict domain scores were fit, which included age, race, D'Amico classification, body mass index, EPIC-26 baseline function, treatment, and standardized scores measuring comorbidity, general QOL, and psychosocial health. We reduced these models by removing the instrument scores and replacing D'Amico classification with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score. For the final model, we performed bootstrap internal validation to assess model calibration from which an easy-to-use web-based tool was developed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The prediction models achieved bias-corrected R-squared values of 0.386, 0.232, 0.183, 0.214, and 0.309 for sexual function, urinary incontinence, urinary irritative, bowel, and hormonal domains, respectively. Differences in R-squared values between the comprehensive and parsimonious models were small in magnitude. Calibration was excellent. The web-based tool is available at https://statez.shinyapps.io/PCDSPred/.

conclusionsFunctional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer can be predicted at the time of diagnosis based on age, race, PSA, biopsy grade, baseline function, and a general question regarding overall health. Providers and patients can use this prediction tool to inform shared decision making. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we studied patient-reported sexual, urinary, hormonal, and bowel function through 5 yr after treatment with radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. We developed a web-based predictive tool that can be used to predict one's outcomes after treatment based on age, race, prostate-specific antigen, biopsy grade, pretreatment baseline function, and a general question regarding overall health. We hope both patients and providers can use this tool to better understand expected outcomes after treatment, further enhancing shared decision making between providers and patients.

Indexed as

InternetWatchful WaitingAgedHumansIntestinesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsSexualityUrinary TractUrinary Tract Physiological PhenomenaComparative effectivenessDisease riskNomogramPatient-reported functionProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32098731
PMCPMC7384934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.