Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098585›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2021

Influence of Geometry and Architecture on the

Mitchell Hallman, J Adam Driscoll, Ryan Lubbe, Soyeon Jeong, Kevin Chang, Meraaj Haleem, Adam Jakus, Richard Pahapill, Chawon Yun, Ramille Shah and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mitchell HallmanNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Adam DriscollNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ryan LubbeNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Soyeon JeongNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kevin ChangNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Meraaj HaleemNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Adam JakusSimpson Querrey Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Richard PahapillNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Chawon YunNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ramille ShahSimpson Querrey Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Wellington K HsuNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Stuart R StockSimpson Querrey Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Erin L HsuNorthwestern University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Argonne National Laboratory · USBeaumont Health · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
3-D Printed Hyperelastic Bone Composites for Bone Regeneration and Spine FusionR01AR069580 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HSU, ERIN L. · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously developed a recombinant growth factor-free, three-dimensional (3D)-printed material comprising hydroxyapatite (HA) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) for bone regeneration. This material has demonstrated the capacity to promote re-mineralization of the DBM particles within the scaffold struts and shows potential to promote successful spine fusion. Here, we investigate the role of geometry and architecture in osteointegration, vascularization, and facilitation of spine fusion in a preclinical model. Inks containing HA and DBM particles in a poly(lactide-co-glycolide) elastomer were 3D-printed into scaffolds with varying relative strut angles (90° vs. 45° advancing angle), macropore size (0 μm vs. 500 μm vs. 1000 μm), and strut alignment (aligned vs. offset). The following configurations were compared with scaffolds containing no macropores: 90°/500 μm/aligned, 45°/500 μm/aligned, 90°/1000 μm/aligned, 45°/1000 μm/aligned, 90°/1000 μm/offset, and 45°/1000 μm/offset. Eighty-four female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent spine fusion with bilateral placement of the various scaffold configurations (

Indexed as

Spinal FusionAnimalsFemalePrinting, Three-DimensionalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue ScaffoldsX-Ray Microtomography3D printingbone regenerationceramic scaffolddemineralized bone matrixspine fusion

Identifiers

PMID32098585
PMCPMC7826428
OpenAlexW3008860258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.