Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098397›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

From R-Loops to G-Quadruplexes: Emerging New Threats for the Replication Fork.

Antonio Maffia, Cecilia Ranise, Simone Sabbioneda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcription-Coupled Repair and R-Loop Crosstalk in Genome Stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Mechanisms underlining R-loop biology and implications for human disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. R-Loops and Its Chro-Mates: The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antonio MaffiaIstituto di Genetica Molecolare "Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza", CNR, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9866-5830
Cecilia RaniseIstituto di Genetica Molecolare "Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza", CNR, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Simone SabbionedaIstituto di Genetica Molecolare "Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza", CNR, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 2017KSZZJW
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replicating the entire genome is one of the most complex tasks for all organisms. Research carried out in the last few years has provided us with a clearer picture on how cells preserve genomic information from the numerous insults that may endanger its stability. Different DNA repair pathways, coping with exogenous or endogenous threat, have been dissected at the molecular level. More recently, there has been an increasing interest towards intrinsic obstacles to genome replication, paving the way to a novel view on genomic stability. Indeed, in some cases, the movement of the replication fork can be hindered by the presence of stable DNA: RNA hybrids (R-loops), the folding of G-rich sequences into G-quadruplex structures (G4s) or repetitive elements present at Common Fragile Sites (CFS). Although differing in their nature and in the way they affect the replication fork, all of these obstacles are a source of replication stress. Replication stress is one of the main hallmarks of cancer and its prevention is becoming increasingly important as a target for future chemotherapeutics. Here we will try to summarize how these three obstacles are generated and how the cells handle replication stress upon their encounter. Finally, we will consider their role in cancer and their exploitation in current chemotherapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA ReplicationGenomic InstabilityG-QuadruplexesR-Loop StructuresDNADNA RepairGenome, HumanHumansNeoplasmsDNAcommon fragile sitesg4 quadruplexgenome stabilityreplication forkR-loop

Identifiers

PMID32098397
PMCPMC7073102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.