Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098163›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Natural Variation in Volatile Emissions of the Invasive Weed

Evans Effah, D Paul Barrett, Paul G Peterson, A Jonathan R Godfrey, Murray A Potter, Jarmo K Holopainen, Andrea Clavijo McCormick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Decoding chemical interactions among pomegranate,Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Positive Chemotaxis of the Entomopathogenic NematodeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Alters Alfalfa (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Evans EffahSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0023-9890
D Paul BarrettSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Paul G PetersonManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Riddet Road, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand.
A Jonathan R GodfreySchool of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8129-8835
Murray A PotterSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Jarmo K HolopainenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5026-3245
Andrea Clavijo McCormickSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3949-2439

Funding

Massey University Massey University Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive plants pose a threat to natural ecosystems, changing the community composition and ecological dynamics. One aspect that has received little attention is the production and emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by invasive plants. Investigating VOCs is important because they are involved in vital ecological interactions such as pollination, herbivory and plant competition. Heather,

Indexed as

heatherinvasive speciesplant scentsplant secondary metabolitessoil nutrientsvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID32098163
PMCPMC7076469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.