Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098136›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Reasons for Increased Caesarean Section Rate in Vietnam: A Qualitative Study among Vietnamese Mothers and Health Care Professionals.

Mizuki Takegata, Chris Smith, Hien Anh Thi Nguyen, Hai Huynh Thi, Trang Nguyen Thi Minh, Louise Tina Day, Toshinori Kitamura, Michiko Toizumi, Duc Anh Dang, Lay-Myint Yoshida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mizuki TakegataDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9082-1886
Chris SmithMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9238-3202
Hien Anh Thi NguyenNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Hai Huynh ThiCollaborative Office for Public Health Research, Khanh Hoa Health Service Governmental Office, Nha Trang 650000, Vietnam.
Trang Nguyen Thi MinhCollaborative Office for Public Health Research, Khanh Hoa Health Service Governmental Office, Nha Trang 650000, Vietnam.
Louise Tina DayMaternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Toshinori KitamuraKitamura Institute of Mental Health Tokyo, Tokyo 1510063, Japan.
Michiko ToizumiDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.
Duc Anh DangNational Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Lay-Myint YoshidaDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.

Funding

the Japan Academy of Midwifery No Grant Number available
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caesarean section rate in urban Vietnam is 43% in 2014, which is more than twice the recommended rate (10%-15%) by the World Health Organization. This qualitative study aims to identify the perceptions of pregnant mothers and health care professionals on the medical and social factors related to the increased Caesarean section rate in Vietnam. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted among pregnant mothers and healthcare professionals at two public hospitals in Nha Trang city. A content analysis was adopted in order to identify social and medical factors. As a result, 29 pregnant women and 19 health care professionals were invited to participate in the qualitative interviews. Private interviews were conducted with 10 women who wished to have a Caesarean section, and the others participated in focus group interviews. The main themes of the social factors were 'request for Caesarean section,' 'mental strain of obstetricians,' and 'decision-making process.' To conclude, this qualitative study suggests that there were unnecessary caesarean sections without a clear medical indication, which were requested by women and family members. Psychological fear occurred among women and family, and doctors were the main determinants for driving the requests for Caesarean section, which implies that education and emotional encouragement is necessary by midwives. In addition, a multi-faced approach including a mandatory reporting system in clinical fields and involving family members in antenatal education is important.

Indexed as

caesarean sectiondeterminantshealth care professionalspregnant womenqualitative interviewVietnam

Identifiers

PMID32098136
PMCPMC7151040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.