ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2020
In Vivo Efficacy of SYN023, an Anti-Rabies Monoclonal Antibody Cocktail, in Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Animal Models.
Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04495569 (A Phase 1 Single Center, Parallel, Open Label Bridging Study to Evaluate on the Safety, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamics and Anti-drug Antibodies), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1 Single Center, Parallel, Open Label Bridging Study to Evaluate on the Safety, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamics and Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) of a Single Intramuscular Doses of SYN023 in Healthy Adult Subjects
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research trends in anti-rabies virus monoclonal antibody: A bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Structural basis for broad neutralization of rabies virus by an antibody cocktail SYN023.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Development of novel canine phage display-derived neutralizing monoclonal antibody fragments against rabies virus from immunized dogs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advances in the progress of monoclonal antibodies for rabies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Review
- The Rabies Concert: Rising towards the Last Waltz?Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021Article
- [New aspects of rabies control].Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rabies immune globulin (RIG) is an indispensable component of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) because it provides passive immunity to prevent this otherwise inescapably fatal disease in Category III exposed patients. Even with decades of development, RIG products are still criticized for their high cost, lot-to-lot variation, and potential safety issues. They remain largely unattainable in most developing regions of the world, where demand is highest. In recent years, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have become widely accepted as safer and more cost-effective alternatives to RIG products. As an example, SYN023 is a 1:1 cocktail of two humanized anti-rabies MAbs previously shown to display extensive neutralizing capabilities. Here, we further assessed the efficacy of SYN023 in animal models of rabies, and found that SYN023 afforded protection equal to a standard dose of human RIG (HRIG) at 0.03 mg/kg in Syrian hamsters and 0.1 mg/kg in beagles. Potential interference with vaccine-induced immunity was analyzed for the MAbs at these concentrations. While individual MAbs did not interfere with vaccine response, SYN023 at dosages of 0.1 mg/kg and above resulted in reduced neutralizing antibody titers similar to HRIG. Thus, the in vivo characterization of SYN023 supports its utility in human rabies PEP as an efficacious alternative to RIG products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.