Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098042›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2020

Safety Aspects of Genetically Modified Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Tina Vida Plavec, Aleš Berlec

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Oral delivery of recombinantDrug delivery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Antibiotic susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal coalho cheese in the Agreste region of Pernambuco, Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Development of the Efficient Electroporation Protocol forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Identification and Characterization ofFood science of animal resources · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tina Vida PlavecDepartment of Biotechnology, Jožef Stefan Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aleš BerlecDepartment of Biotechnology, Jožef Stefan Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8095-6998

Funding

Slovenian Research Agency J4-9327, P4-0127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have a long history of use in the food industry. Some species are part of the normal human microbiota and have beneficial properties for human health. Their long-standing use and considerable biotechnological potential have led to the development of various systems for their engineering. Together with novel approaches such as CRISPR-Cas, the established systems for engineering now allow significant improvements to LAB strains. Nevertheless, genetically modified LAB (GM-LAB) still encounter disapproval and are under extensive regulatory requirements. This review presents data on the prospects for LAB to obtain 'generally recognized as safe' (GRAS) status. Genetic modification of LAB is discussed, together with problems that can arise from their engineering, including their dissemination into the environment and the spread of antibiotic resistance markers. Possible solutions that would allow the use of GM-LAB are described, such as biocontainment, alternative selection markers, and use of homologous DNA. The use of GM-LAB as cell factories in closed systems that prevent their environmental release is the least problematic aspect, and this is also discussed.

Indexed as

cell factoryengineeringgenerally recognized as safelactic acid bacteriasafety

Identifiers

PMID32098042
PMCPMC7074969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.