Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32097447›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A comparison of post-saccadic oscillations in European-Born and China-Born British University Undergraduates.

Diako Mardanbegi, Thomas D W Wilcockson, Rebecca Killick, Baiqiang Xia, Hans Gellersen, Peter Sawyer, Trevor J Crawford

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diako MardanbegiSchool of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1976-601X
Thomas D W WilcocksonSchool of Sport, Exercise, and Health Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Rebecca KillickDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0583-3960
Baiqiang XiaSchool of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Hans GellersenSchool of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Peter SawyerSchool Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8044-2738
Trevor J CrawfordDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Lancaster University · GBAston University · GBLoughborough University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has revealed that people from different genetic, racial, biological, and/or cultural backgrounds may display fundamental differences in eye-tracking behavior. These differences may have a cognitive origin or they may be at a lower level within the neurophysiology of the oculomotor network, or they may be related to environment factors. In this paper we investigated one of the physiological aspects of eye movements known as post-saccadic oscillations and we show that this type of eye movement is very different between two different populations. We compared the post-saccadic oscillations recorded by a video-based eye tracker between two groups of participants: European-born and Chinese-born British students. We recorded eye movements from a group of 42 Caucasians defined as White British or White Europeans and 52 Chinese-born participants all with ages ranging from 18 to 36 during a prosaccade task. The post-saccadic oscillations were extracted from the gaze data which was compared between the two groups in terms of their first overshoot and undershoot. The results revealed that the shape of the post-saccadic oscillations varied significantly between the two groups which may indicate a difference in a multitude of genetic, cultural, physiologic, anatomical or environmental factors. We further show that the differences in the post-saccadic oscillations could influence the oculomotor characteristics such as saccade duration. We conclude that genetic, racial, biological, and/or cultural differences can affect the morphology of the eye movement data recorded and should be considered when studying eye movements and oculomotor fixation and saccadic behaviors.

Indexed as

SaccadesUniversitiesAdolescentAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleWhite PeopleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32097447
PMCPMC7041864
OpenAlexW3006796357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.