Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32097418›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Robust, independent and relevant prognostic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer: Are there any?

Tom Konert, Sarah Everitt, Matthew D La Fontaine, Jeroen B van de Kamer, Michael P MacManus, Wouter V Vogel, Jason Callahan, Jan-Jakob Sonke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Tracer Uptake Time in Non-Small Cell Lung CancerJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Histogram-Based Textural Analysis ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022
    Article
  10. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. A Role for FDG PET Radiomics in Personalized Medicine?Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The value ofTzu chi medical journal
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tom KonertNuclear Medicine Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4678-136X
Sarah EverittDivision of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthew D La FontaineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen B van de KamerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael P MacManusDivision of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Wouter V VogelNuclear Medicine Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jason CallahanDivision of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Jan-Jakob SonkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLThe University of Melbourne · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In locally advanced lung cancer, established baseline clinical variables show limited prognostic accuracy and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) radiomics features may increase accuracy for optimal treatment selection. Their robustness and added value relative to current clinical factors are unknown. Hence, we identify robust and independent PET radiomics features that may have complementary value in predicting survival endpoints. A 4D PET dataset (n = 70) was used for assessing the repeatability (Bland-Altman analysis) and independence of PET radiomics features (Spearman rank: |ρ|<0.5). Two 3D PET datasets combined (n = 252) were used for training and validation of an elastic net regularized generalized logistic regression model (GLM) based on a selection of clinical and robust independent PET radiomics features (GLMall). The fitted model performance was externally validated (n = 40). The performance of GLMall (measured with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) was highest in predicting 2-year overall survival (0.66±0.07). No significant improvement was observed for GLMall compared to a model containing only PET radiomics features or only clinical variables for any clinical endpoint. External validation of GLMall led to AUC values no higher than 0.55 for any clinical endpoint. In this study, robust independent FDG PET radiomics features did not have complementary value in predicting survival endpoints in lung cancer patients. Improving risk stratification and clinical decision making based on clinical variables and PET radiomics features has still been proven difficult in locally advanced lung cancer patients.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID32097418
PMCPMC7041813
OpenAlexW3006841387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.