Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32097413›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The impact of respiratory gating on improving volume measurement of murine lung tumors in micro-CT imaging.

S J Blocker, M D Holbrook, Y M Mowery, D C Sullivan, C T Badea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MRI Coregistered Rodent Histotripsy Array for Orthotopic Liver Models.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S J BlockerCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
M D HolbrookCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Y M MoweryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
D C SullivanCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
C T BadeaCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

The Duke Preclinical Research Resources for Quantitative Imaging BiomarkersU24CA220245 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, CRISTIAN T · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Development of a New Generation Micro-CT imaging for Functional and Molecular Imaging of CancerR01CA196667 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BADEA, CRISTIAN T · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196667NCI NIH HHS U24 CA220245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small animal imaging has become essential in evaluating new cancer therapies as they are translated from the preclinical to clinical domain. However, preclinical imaging faces unique challenges that emphasize the gap between mouse and man. One example is the difference in breathing patterns and breath-holding ability, which can dramatically affect tumor burden assessment in lung tissue. As part of a co-clinical trial studying immunotherapy and radiotherapy in sarcomas, we are using micro-CT of the lungs to detect and measure metastases as a metric of disease progression. To effectively utilize metastatic disease detection as a metric of progression, we have addressed the impact of respiratory gating during micro-CT acquisition on improving lung tumor detection and volume quantitation. Accuracy and precision of lung tumor measurements with and without respiratory gating were studied by performing experiments with in vivo images, simulations, and a pocket phantom. When performing test-retest studies in vivo, the variance in volume calculations was 5.9% in gated images and 15.8% in non-gated images, compared to 2.9% in post-mortem images. Sensitivity of detection was examined in images with simulated tumors, demonstrating that reliable sensitivity (true positive rate (TPR) ≥ 90%) was achievable down to 1.0 mm3 lesions with respiratory gating, but was limited to ≥ 8.0 mm3 in non-gated images. Finally, a clinically-inspired "pocket phantom" was used during in vivo mouse scanning to aid in refining and assessing the gating protocols. Application of respiratory gating techniques reduced variance of repeated volume measurements and significantly improved the accuracy of tumor volume quantitation in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsData AccuracyDisease Models, AnimalLung NeoplasmsLung Volume MeasurementsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicPhantoms, ImagingRespiratory-Gated Imaging TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID32097413
PMCPMC7041814
OpenAlexW3006936330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.