ArticlePloS one2020
The impact of respiratory gating on improving volume measurement of murine lung tumors in micro-CT imaging.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Method for retrospective, respiratory-gated, anatomical optical coherence tomography for airway wall elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- MRI Coregistered Rodent Histotripsy Array for Orthotopic Liver Models.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025Article
- The National Cancer Institute's Co-Clinical Quantitative Imaging Research Resources for Precision Medicine in Preclinical and Clinical Settings.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy and Surgery Improves Metastasis-Free Survival over Surgery Alone in a Primary Mouse Model of Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2023Article
- Simultaneous assessment of lung morphology and respiratory motion in retrospectively gated in-vivo microCT of free breathing anesthetized mice.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Intrinsic Respiratory Gating for Simultaneous Multi-Mouse μCT Imaging to Assess Liver Tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Detection of Lung Nodules in Micro-CT Imaging Using Deep Learning.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2021Article
- Simple low dose radiography allows precise lung volume assessment in mice.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Advancements in Methods and Camera-Based Sensors for the Quantification of Respiration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program (CIRP): Bridging the Translational Divide to Advance Precision Medicine.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Small animal imaging has become essential in evaluating new cancer therapies as they are translated from the preclinical to clinical domain. However, preclinical imaging faces unique challenges that emphasize the gap between mouse and man. One example is the difference in breathing patterns and breath-holding ability, which can dramatically affect tumor burden assessment in lung tissue. As part of a co-clinical trial studying immunotherapy and radiotherapy in sarcomas, we are using micro-CT of the lungs to detect and measure metastases as a metric of disease progression. To effectively utilize metastatic disease detection as a metric of progression, we have addressed the impact of respiratory gating during micro-CT acquisition on improving lung tumor detection and volume quantitation. Accuracy and precision of lung tumor measurements with and without respiratory gating were studied by performing experiments with in vivo images, simulations, and a pocket phantom. When performing test-retest studies in vivo, the variance in volume calculations was 5.9% in gated images and 15.8% in non-gated images, compared to 2.9% in post-mortem images. Sensitivity of detection was examined in images with simulated tumors, demonstrating that reliable sensitivity (true positive rate (TPR) ≥ 90%) was achievable down to 1.0 mm3 lesions with respiratory gating, but was limited to ≥ 8.0 mm3 in non-gated images. Finally, a clinically-inspired "pocket phantom" was used during in vivo mouse scanning to aid in refining and assessing the gating protocols. Application of respiratory gating techniques reduced variance of repeated volume measurements and significantly improved the accuracy of tumor volume quantitation in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.