Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32097117›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2020

Effects on Medical Students of Longitudinal Small-Group Learning about Breaking Bad News.

Edlaine Faria de Moura Villela, Luana Kronit Bastos, Wanderson Sant'ana de Almeida, Andressa Oliveira Pereira, Matheus Silva de Paula Rocha, Fábio Morato de Oliveira, Valdes Roberto Bollela

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06376188 (Improving Breaking Bad News in Pediatrics by Simulated Communication), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06376188 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Improving Breaking Bad News in Pediatrics by Simulated Communication: The Prospective Randomized Controlled SimCom Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled46ConditionsCommunication, End of Life, Pediatric ALLArmscommunication training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Delivering Bad News: Self-Assessment and Educational Preferences of Medical Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edlaine Faria de Moura VillelaJataí Medical School, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.
Luana Kronit BastosJataí Medical School, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.
Wanderson Sant'ana de AlmeidaJataí Medical School, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.
Andressa Oliveira PereiraJataí Medical School, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.
Matheus Silva de Paula RochaJataí Medical School, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.
Fábio Morato de OliveiraJataí Medical School, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.
Valdes Roberto BollelaRibeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDelivering bad news is a difficult task for physicians, and medical schools do not always prepare future physicians for this inevitable task.

objectiveTo examine training in breaking bad news, to improve medical students' competence and confidence in dealing with this important aspect of clinical practice.

methodsAn exploratory study using a qualitative approach was done at a Brazilian public university's medical school, which receives 30 medical students per semester. Two focus groups were conducted in 2018, with 15 students per group, before and after the training. The intervention consisted of a 6-month (4 h/wk) course about breaking bad news offered to 30 third-year medical students. The communication course included the perspectives of health care professionals, patients, and their families; the SPIKES protocol and the "ABCDE" mnemonic for delivering bad news; general guidelines; and role-playing/simulation strategies to improve students' skills and reduce their personal limitations.

resultsResults of the preintervention focus group demonstrated that only 30% of the students were aware of the importance of breaking bad news and of the existence of specific protocols to guide physicians in these situations. Findings from the postintervention focus group indicated that 90% of students understood the importance and began to apply protocols in their practice. DISCUSSION: Breaking bad news is a challenge for undergraduate medical students. The results of our qualitative study showed that students' perceptions about their capability in delivering bad news increased significantly after regular and focused training. The knowledge, skills, and attitudes acquired strengthened the students' self-reported ability to deal with situations requiring breaking bad news.

conclusionThe activities offered helped students develop communication skills. They made connections between their formal training (communication and cognitive skills) and actual clinical practice in a community-based rotation. The knowledge and skills acquired gave them tools needed to deliver bad news in their future clinical practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationGroup ProcessesLearningTruth DisclosureBrazilClinical CompetenceCurriculumEmotionsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchRole PlayingStudents, Medical

Identifiers

PMID32097117
PMCPMC7039420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.