Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32097116›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2020

Immunotherapy Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma in Relation to Age.

Krishna Joshi, Dinesh Atwal, Rahul Ravilla, Yadav Pandey, Naveen Yarlagadda, Sunil Kakadia, Issam Makhoul, Laura Hutchins, Fade Mahmoud

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishna JoshiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock.
Dinesh AtwalDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock.
Rahul RavillaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Albany Medical Center, NY.
Yadav PandeyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock.
Naveen YarlagaddaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock.
Sunil KakadiaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock.
Issam MakhoulDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock.
Laura HutchinsDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock.
Fade MahmoudDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock.
University of Arkansas Medical Center · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlder age is a melanoma risk factor. Elderly individuals are likelier to have immunosenescence, which could help melanoma cells escape immune surveillance. Hence, it is believed that elderly people cannot mount a potent immune response to checkpoint inhibitors to eliminate melanoma.

objectivesTo investigate age-related differences in the time to progression, overall survival, and immunotherapy-related adverse events among patients with metastatic melanoma who received checkpoint inhibitors.

methodsWe retrospectively identified patients at our institution between January 2012 and December 2016 with stage IV melanoma who received at least 1 dose of ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or combined ipilimumab and nivolumab. Demographic, pathologic, and clinical characteristics were obtained. Immune-related response criteria were used to define responses.

resultsTwenty-nine patients were younger than age 65 years and 31 were age 65 years or older. Time to progression was comparable between the age groups (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-1.70, p = 0.46). Overall survival was not significantly different after immunotherapy between groups (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval = 0.31-1.82, p = 0.491). Overall, immunotherapy-related adverse events were comparable between groups, with 62% in younger patients (18/29) and 45% in older patients (14/31 p = 0.19). Of 60 patients, 30 responded to immunotherapy. Nonresponders were more likely than responders to have BRAF-mutated melanomas (16 [53.3%] vs 8 [27.6%]; p = 0.04) and less likely to have immunotherapy-related adverse events (12 [40%] vs 20 [66.7%]; p = 0.04).

conclusionAging does not seem to affect response to checkpoint inhibitors. Elderly patients with metastatic melanoma should be treated similarly to younger patients.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNivolumabProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBRAF protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumabpembrolizumabProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID32097116
PMCPMC7039418
OpenAlexW3011937409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.