Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32096600›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2020

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing: From basic research to translational medicine.

Filipe V Jacinto, Wolfgang Link, Bibiana I Ferreira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Study on the Role of Galectin-3 in Sepsis.Biochemical genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Loop engineering improves prime editing efficiency.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Expanding the CRISPR/Cas toolkit: applications in proteomics and theranostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filipe V JacintoCentre for Biomedical Research (CBMR), Faro, Portugal.
Wolfgang LinkInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols" (CSIC-UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Bibiana I FerreiraCentre for Biomedical Research (CBMR), Faro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4772-9395

Funding

Marie Curie #748585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent development of the CRISPR/Cas9 system as an efficient and accessible programmable genome-editing tool has revolutionized basic science research. CRISPR/Cas9 system-based technologies have armed researchers with new powerful tools to unveil the impact of genetics on disease development by enabling the creation of precise cellular and animal models of human diseases. The therapeutic potential of these technologies is tremendous, particularly in gene therapy, in which a patient-specific mutation is genetically corrected in order to treat human diseases that are untreatable with conventional therapies. However, the translation of CRISPR/Cas9 into the clinics will be challenging, since we still need to improve the efficiency, specificity and delivery of this technology. In this review, we focus on several in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in human disease-focused research, explore the potential of this technology in translational medicine and discuss some of the major challenges for its future use in patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyHumansModels, AnimalMutationTranslational Research, BiomedicalCRISPRgene therapygenome editingtranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID32096600
PMCPMC7171402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.