Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32096563›Full record

ReviewDevelopment, growth & differentiation2020

Regeneration enhancers: A clue to reactivation of developmental genes.

Nanoka Suzuki, Haruki Ochi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development, growth & differentiation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Regulation of chromatin organization during animal regeneration.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  8. The regeneration-responsive elementFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Regeneration enhancers: a field in development.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Adrenergic receptor signaling induced by Klf15, a regulator of regeneration enhancer, promotes kidney reconstruction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nanoka SuzukiAmphibian Research Center, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.
Haruki OchiInstitute for Promotion of Medical Science Research, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0088-581X

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K07362Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K06672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During tissue and organ regeneration, cells initially detect damage and then alter nuclear transcription in favor of tissue/organ reconstruction. Until recently, studies of tissue regeneration have focused on the identification of relevant genes. These studies show that many developmental genes are reused during regeneration. Concurrently, comparative genomics studies have shown that the total number of genes does not vastly differ among vertebrate taxa. Moreover, functional analyses of developmental genes using various knockout/knockdown techniques demonstrated that the functions of these genes are conserved among vertebrates. Despite these data, the ability to regenerate damaged body parts varies widely between animals. Thus, it is important to determine how regenerative transcriptional programs are triggered and why animals with low regenerative potential fail to express developmental genes after injury. Recently, we discovered relevant enhancers and named them regeneration signal-response enhancers (RSREs) after identifying their activation mechanisms in a Xenopus laevis transgenic system. In this review, we summarize recent studies of injury/regeneration-associated enhancers and then discuss their mechanisms of activation.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalRegenerationXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsXenopus Proteinsanimalsdevelopmental genesregenerationtranscription factorsXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID32096563
PMCPMC7383998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.