SynthesisBioscience reports2020
Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors as the maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Bioscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- PARP inhibitors in breast and ovarian cancer with BRCA mutations: a meta-analysis of survival.Aging · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitors as a Monotherapy for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitors as Maintenance Therapy in Platinum Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- PARP inhibitor maintenance in first-line ovarian cancer therapy: emerging standards and strategies to overcome resistance.American journal of cancer research · 2026Review
- Beta-glucans in oncology: revolutionizing treatment with immune power & tumor targeting.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- C5aR1 inhibition reprograms tumor associated macrophages and reverses PARP inhibitor resistance in breast cancer.Nature communications · 2024Article
- AKAP8 promotes ovarian cancer progression and antagonizes PARP inhibitor sensitivity through regulating hnRNPUL1 transcription.iScience · 2024Article
- PARP Inhibition Increases the Reliance on ATR/CHK1 Checkpoint Signaling Leading to Synthetic Lethality-An Alternative Treatment Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells Independent from HR Effectiveness.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Are Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors Safe in Paraneoplastic Dermatomyositis due to High-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary? A Case Report and a Review of the Literature.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePoly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors can effectively kill cancer cells by restraining the activity of DNA repair enzymes and utilizing the characteristics of BRCA mutations. This article evaluates the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer.
methodWe searched for clinical trials in electronic databases. PARPis efficacy were evaluated by the hazard ratios (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the PARPis groups and placebo groups, while the PARPis' safety was assessed by relative risk (RR) values of adverse events (AEs) between the two arms.
resultsThe immature OS data manifested that patients with BRCA mutation receiving PARPis therapy versus placebo therapy appeared to have longer OS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.61-1.01; P = 0.06). Compared with placebo group, PARP group had a significant advantage in PFS in ovarian cancer patients with BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt), BRCA mutation (BRCAm), BRCA status unclassified, BRCA1 mutation subgroup and the BRCA2 mutation subgroup (BRCAwt: HR = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.42-0.68, P < 0.00001; BRCAm: HR = 0.30, 95%CI = 0.26-0.34, P < 0.00001; BRCA status unclassified: HR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.41-0.66, P < 0.00001; BRCA1m: HR = 0.38, 95%CI = 0.29-0.48, P < 0.00001; BRCA2m: HR = 0.23, 95%CI = 0.10-0.57, P = 0.001). Our analysis revealed the incidence rates for AEs of grade ≥3 (grades 3 to 4) and serious AEs in PARPis group were 55.19% and 26.29%, respectively.
conclusionOur meta-analysis demonstrates that PARPis therapy can significantly improve PFS in ovarian cancer patients, but it has no benefit in OS. However, the therapy is associated with a significant increase in the risk of AEs of grade ≥ 3 and serious AEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.