Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32096302›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

Opioid agonist treatment and fatal overdose risk in a state-wide US population receiving opioid use disorder services.

Noa Krawczyk, Ramin Mojtabai, Elizabeth A Stuart, Michael Fingerhood, Deborah Agus, B Casey Lyons, Jonathan P Weiner, Brendan Saloner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07148206 (Dronabinol and Epidiolex to Manage Uncontrolled Residual Symptoms of Buprenorphine Initiation Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 117 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07148206 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Dronabinol and Epidiolex to Manage Uncontrolled Residual Symptoms of Buprenorphine Initiation Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2026 to 2028Enrolled40ConditionsOpioid Use DisorderArmsDronabinol Capsules, Epidiolex 100 mg/mL Oral Solution, Placebo Dronabinol, Placebo Epidiolex
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Medicaid health home design and buprenorphine receipt, 2009-2020.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noa KrawczykDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7396-3938
Ramin MojtabaiDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elizabeth A StuartDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael FingerhoodDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Deborah AgusDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
B Casey LyonsMaryland Department of Health, Office of Provider Engagement and Regulation, Catonsville, MD, USA.
Jonathan P WeinerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brendan SalonerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9013-3023
Johns Hopkins University · USRider University · US

Funding

Assessing the relationship between opioid agonist therapy and risk of overdose and criminal justice involvement in Maryland: a population-based approachF31DA047021 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KRAWCZYK, NOA · 2018 to 2018
$45k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA047021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEvidence from randomized controlled trials establishes that medication treatment with methadone and buprenorphine reduces opioid use and improves treatment retention. However, little is known about the role of such medications compared with non-medication treatments in mitigating overdose risk among US patient populations receiving treatment in usual care settings. This study compared overdose mortality among those in medication versus non-medication treatments in specialty care settings.

designRetrospective cohort study using state-wide treatment data linked to death records. Survival analysis was used to analyze data in a time-to-event framework.

settingServices delivered by 757 providers in publicly funded out-patient specialty treatment programs in Maryland, USA between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2016.

participantsA total of 48 274 adults admitted to out-patient specialty treatment programs in 2015-16 for primary diagnosis of opioid use disorder. MEASUREMENTS: Main exposure was time in medication treatment (methadone/buprenorphine), time following medication treatment, time exposed to non-medication treatments and time following non-medication treatment. Main outcome was opioid overdose death during and after treatment. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression. Propensity score weights were adjusted for patient information on sex, age, race, region of residence, marital and veteran status, employment, homelessness, primary opioid, mental health treatment, arrests and criminal justice referral.

findingsThe study population experienced 371 opioid overdose deaths. Periods in medication treatment were associated with substantially reduced hazard of opioid overdose death compared with periods in non-medication treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.08-0.40]. Periods after discharge from non-medication treatment (aHR = 5.45, 95% CI = 2.80-9.53) and medication treatment (aHR = 5.85, 95% CI = 3.10-11.02) had similar and substantially elevated risks compared with periods in non-medication treatments.

conclusionsAmong Maryland patients in specialty opioid treatment, periods in treatment are protective against overdose compared with periods out of care. Methadone and buprenorphine are associated with significantly lower overdose death compared with non-medication treatments during care but not after treatment is discontinued.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineCause of DeathCohort StudiesDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMarylandMethadoneMiddle AgedNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsData linkageopioid agonistsopioidsoverdosetreatmentusual care

Identifiers

PMID32096302
PMCPMC7426244
OpenAlexW3008253059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.