Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32096084›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2020

Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences.

Cari Levy, Mary Ersek, Winifred Scott, Joan G Carpenter, Jennifer Kononowech, Ciaran Phibbs, Jill Lowry, Jennifer Cohen, Marybeth Foglia

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. No Wrong Floor on the Elevator: A Vision for the VA as an Age-Friendly Health System.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cari LevyDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Rocky Mountain VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA. Cari.Levy@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-7485-280X
Mary ErsekDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Winifred ScottDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Joan G CarpenterDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jennifer KononowechDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ciaran PhibbsDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jill LowryDepartment of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA.
Jennifer CohenDepartment of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA.
Marybeth FogliaDepartment of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

VA QUE 15-288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOn July 1, 2018, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Center for Ethics in Health Care implemented the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI). Its goal is to identify, document, and honor LST decisions of seriously ill veterans. Providers document veterans' goals and decisions using a standardized LST template and order set.

objectiveEvaluate the first 7 months of LSTDI implementation and identify predictors of LST template completion.

designRetrospective observational study of clinical and administrative data. We identified all completed LST templates, defined as completion of four required template fields. Templates also include four non-required fields. Results were stratified by risk of hospitalization or death as estimated by the Care Assessment Need (CAN) score. SUBJECTS: All veterans with VA utilization between July 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019. MAIN MEASURES: Completed LST templates, goals and LST preferences, and predictors of documentation.

resultsLST templates were documented for 108,145 veterans, and 85% had one or more of the non-required fields completed in addition to the required fields. Approximately half documented a preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among those who documented specific goals, half wanted to improve or maintain function, independence, and quality of life while 28% had a goal of life prolongation irrespective of risk of hospitalization/death and 45% expressed a goal of comfort. Only 7% expressed a goal of being cured. Predictors of documentation included VA nursing home residence, older age, frailty, and comorbidity, while non-Caucasian race, rural residence, and receipt of care in a lower complexity medical center were predictive of no documentation.

conclusionsLST decisions were documented for veterans at high risk of hospitalization or death. While few expressed a preference for cure, half desire, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Predictors of documentation were generally consistent with existing literature. Opportunities to reduce observed disparities exist by leveraging available VA resources and programs.

Indexed as

Terminal CareVeteransAgedDocumentationHumansQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairsend of lifeseriously illveteran

Identifiers

PMID32096084
PMCPMC7280392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.