Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32096022›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2020

A scoping review and network meta-analysis for efficacy and safety of glaucoma medication in Japanese patients.

Kenji Inoue, Kyoko Ishida, Goji Tomita, Hisashi Noma

Abstract readScoping ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Two-Year Post-Market Surveillance of iStentClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Article
  2. From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kenji InoueInouye Eye Hospital, 4-3 Kanda-surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0062, Japan. 2inoue-k@inouye-eye.or.jp.
Kyoko IshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-17-6 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8515, Japan.
Goji TomitaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-17-6 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8515, Japan.
Hisashi NomaDepartment of Data science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo, 190-8562, Japan.
Inouye Eye Hospital · JPThe Institute of Statistical Mathematics · JPToho University · JPToho University Ohashi Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of glaucoma medication in Japanese patients, network meta-analysis (NMA) of an intraocular pressure(IOP) reduction, adverse reaction rates and conjunctival congestion rates of major glaucoma drugs used in clinical practice in Japan were conducted using the new drug application (NDA) data. STUDY

designScoping network meta-analysis.

methodsOut of all clinical trials in the interview forms of major glaucoma drugs approved in Japan as of July 2015, active-control clinical trials with Japanese patients were identified through screening with specific criteria. The details of IOP reduction, adverse reaction rates and conjunctival hyperemia rates of the trials were collected from published articles, package inserts, interview forms and Summary basis of approval made by Japan Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). The mean difference in IOP reduction, adverse reaction rates, and conjunctival hyperemia rates of eligible trials were assessed using NMA as referenced to those of timolol maleate 0.5%.

resultsEleven multicenter trials of ten medications in total, (five prostaglandin (PG) analogs, three β-blockers, one α-1 blocker, and one α-2 stimulator) were selected. The mean difference in IOP reduction in mmHg with 95% confidence intervals were as follows: bimatoprost -3.00 (-3.71; -2.29), tafluprost -2.45 (-3.65; -1.25), travoprost -2.35 (-3.41; -1.29), and latanoprost -2.05 (-2.72; -1.38). The highest IOP reduction was achieved by PG analogs. Adverse reaction rates and conjunctival hyperemia rates were significantly larger with PG analogs than with other medications.

conclusionThe efficacy and safety of glaucoma medications were assessed by NMA as reference to those of timolol maleate 0.5% in Japanese patients. PG analogs were the most efficacious in reducing IOP. However, PG analogs were also associated with higher rates of adverse reactions and conjunctival hyperemia.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureJapanMorbidityAntihypertensive AgentsEfficacyGlaucoma medicationsJapanese patientsNetwork meta-analysisSafety

Identifiers

PMID32096022
OpenAlexW3007445412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.