ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2020
Stakeholder Perspectives on Implementation Challenges and Strategies for Moving On Initiatives in Permanent Supportive Housing.
Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitators and barriers to monitoring and evaluation at syringe service programs.Harm reduction journal · 2024Article
- The POP (Permanent Supportive Housing Overdose Prevention) Study: protocol for a hybrid type 3 stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.Implementation science : IS · 2022Review
- Medicaid Waivers and Tenancy Supports for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: Implementation Challenges in Four States.The Milbank quarterly · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moving On Initiatives (MOIs) assist individuals with the transition from permanent supportive housing to mainstream housing without the embedded supports. This emerging innovation has the potential to increase behavioral health system capacity and provide recipients with the opportunity to live in the least restrictive setting. However, few empirical studies have examined MOIs, and little is known about the implementation challenges providers face and strategies they use to realize these initiatives in practice. To identify these challenges and strategies, this study utilized over 2 years of observations at MOI "learning collaboratives," as well as eight focus groups with implementation stakeholders. Analyses informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) identified challenges in the outer and inner service settings, as well as at the individual and innovation level. Outer setting challenges were most prominent in the data, and one non-CFIR construct, macrosystemic characteristics arose inductively. Implications for behavioral health policy and practice are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32095999What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.