Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095886›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2020

Objective computerised assessment of residual ridge resorption in the human maxilla and maxillary sinus pneumatisation.

Ulrike Gerken, Felix Esser, Stephan C Möhlhenrich, Alexander K Bartella, Frank Hölzle, Horst Fischer, Stefan Raith, Timm Steiner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Finite element analysis of primary healing implants with different transmucosal designs.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrike GerkenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 62074, Aachen, Germany. ulli.gerken@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-3544
Felix EsserDepartment of Dental Materials and Biomaterials Research, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Stephan C MöhlhenrichDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 62074, Aachen, Germany.
Alexander K BartellaDepartment of Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Leipzig, Liebigstraße 12, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Frank HölzleDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 62074, Aachen, Germany.
Horst FischerDepartment of Dental Materials and Biomaterials Research, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Stefan RaithDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 62074, Aachen, Germany.
Timm SteinerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 62074, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DELeipzig University · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAtrophic resorption of the maxillary alveolar ridge is a complication that makes implantological rehabilitation critical. Our aim was to develop a novel computer aided procedure for the accurate quantitative assessment of maxillary residual ridge resorption including pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus that goes beyond previously described approaches and to apply it to a large dataset. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo develop and refine the method, we performed a retrospective analysis using computed tomography data from 405 patients to generate segmented, three-dimensional models of zygomaticomaxillary bones and maxillary sinuses. Using anatomical landmarks and orientation lines or planes, all models were aligned automatically to subsequently generate cross-sectional images (n = 2835), enabling the classification of atrophy as well as the quantification of volumes and caudal extensions of the maxillary sinuses.

resultsWe developed and implemented an accurate and reproducible workflow for the semi-automated analysis of volumetric maxillary images. Comprehensive statistical analysis of the large quantitative dataset revealed various correlations of maxillary process heights and sinus volumes with atrophy class, age and region and identified conjectural trends over the patient group.

conclusionsThe method was used successfully to process a large dataset to classify atrophy, to measure alveolar height parameters, and to quantify maxillary sinus volume, bottom volume and pneumatisation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Apart from the anthropometric value of the generated dataset, the method could be applied to provide additional and more accurate data to assess the necessity of bone augmentation in the context of three-dimensional planning before implantation.

Indexed as

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationMaxillary SinusAlveolar ProcessCross-Sectional StudiesDental Implantation, EndosseousHumansMaxillaRetrospective StudiesImplantologyMaxillary atrophyMaxillary sinus bottom volumeSinus liftSinus pneumatisationThree-dimensional analysing

Identifiers

PMID32095886
OpenAlexW3007156108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.