ArticleDer Orthopade2020
[Implant-associated joint infections].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Poly(propylene fumarate)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite/black phosphorus nanosheet phosphate composites for enhanced bone repair.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Musculoskeletal infections caused by streptococcus infantarius - a case series and review of literature.International orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Enhanced Long-Term Antibacterial and Osteogenic Properties of Silver-Loaded Titanium Dioxide Nanotube Arrays for Implant Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Hydrogel-Based 3D Bioprinting Technology for Articular Cartilage Regenerative Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- [Individual megaspacers in two-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty-clinical and functional results after 2 years : Individual metal-endoskeleton cement spacer (iMECS)].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Case Report: Complex Treatment Using Vibroacoustic Therapy in a Patient With Co-Infection and COVID-19.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Exciting Performance of Plasma Fibrinogen in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2021Article
- [Periprosthetic joint infections : Latest developments, strategies and treatment algorithms].Der Orthopade · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the increasing number of endoprosthetic joint replacement operations in older patients as well as in patients with severe primary diseases and comorbidities, the number of revision operations is continuously increasing due to infections. The infection of an endoprosthesis represents a complex clinical picture. This article provides a detailed overview of the treatment of periprosthetic infections with a focus on the diagnostic approach and treatment decision-making. A differentiation is made in periprosthetic infections between infections with a mature or immature biofilm on the surface of the implant. Depending on this, different treatment concepts are available. Highly acute infections represent an orthopedic/surgical emergency in artificial as well as in native joints. Low-grade infections play a role particularly in the area of exchange endoprosthetics. The greatest possible success is achieved only by the interplay of a timely diagnosis, sufficient surgical approach and individualized anti-infective treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.