ArticleDigital biomarkers
Tablet-Based Application for Objective Measurement of Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson Disease.
Article in Digital biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Devices for Assessing Motor Functions in Mobility-Impaired and Healthy Populations: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of keystroke dynamics as digital biomarkers for fine motor decline in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Cross-Cohort Prediction of Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Free-Living Motor Symptoms in Patients With Parkinson Disease Through Smartwatches: Protocol for Defining Digital Biomarkers.JMIR research protocols · 2025Observational
- Medication versus globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease with deep learning video analysis of finger tapping.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Handwriting, touchscreen dexterity and bradykinesia measures in Parkinson's disease: a feature selection study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Portable Touchscreen Assessment of Motor Skill: A Registered Report of the Reliability and Validity of EDNA MoTap.Assessment · 2025Article
- "Self-care selfies": Patient-uploaded videos capture meaningful changes in dexterity over 6 months.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Validating the measurement of upper limb sensorimotor behavior utilizing a tablet in neurologically intact controls and individuals with chronic stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- The role of sex and handedness in the performance of the smartphone-based Finger-Tapping Test.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson's disease: a proof of concept study.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2023Article
- A Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Sensitivity of Finger Tapping to Medication Effects in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2022Article
- Measurement of upper limb function in ALS: a structured review of current methods and future directions.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Remote Assessments of Hand Function in Neurological Disorders: Systematic Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2022Review
- Developing and assessing a new web-based tapping test for measuring distal movement in Parkinson's disease: a Distal Finger Tapping test.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Reply to: Touchscreen Smartphone Interaction in Parkinson's Disease and Healthy Subjects on Out-Patient Clinics.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2021Article
- Exploring Test-Retest Reliability and Longitudinal Stability of Digital Biomarkers for Parkinson Disease in the m-Power Data Set: Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Impaired Touchscreen Skills in Parkinson's Disease and Effects of Medication.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2021Article
- Touchscreen-based finger tapping: Repeatability and configuration effects on tapping performance.PloS one · 2021Article
- The BRadykinesia Akinesia INcoordination (BRAIN) Tap Test: Capturing the Sequence Effect.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe motor subscale of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS-III) has limited applicability for the assessment of motor fluctuations in the home setting.
methodsTo assess whether a self-administered, tablet-based application can reliably quantify differences in motor performance using two-target finger tapping and forearm pronation-supination tasks in the ON (maximal dopaminergic medication efficacy) and OFF (reemergence of parkinsonian deficits) medication states, we recruited 11 Parkinson disease (PD) patients (age, 60.6 ± 9.0 years; disease duration, 12.8 ± 4.1 years) and 11 healthy age-matched controls (age, 62.5 ± 10.5 years). The total number of taps, tap interval, tap duration, and tap accuracy were algorithmically calculated by the application, using the more affected side in patients and the dominant hand in healthy controls.
resultsCompared to the OFF state, PD patients showed a higher number of taps (84.2 ± 20.3 vs. 54.9 ± 26.9 taps;
conclusionsA self-administered, tablet-based application can reliably distinguish between OFF and ON states in fluctuating PD patients and may be sensitive to additional motor phenomena, such as accuracy, not captured by the MDS-UPDRS-III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.