ReviewFood and waterborne parasitology
Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art.
Review in Food and waterborne parasitology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expert knowledge elicitation to determine the relative importance of potentially foodborne parasitic diseases in Armenia.Food and waterborne parasitology · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes After Hepatectomy for Alveolar Echinococcosis in Immunosuppressed Patients.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multifaceted nature of milk: potential source of parasites and a natural approach to parasite infection control.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Monitoring incidence of human echinococcosis in Spain: 2000-2021.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2026Article
- A multicenter hospital-based analysis of cystic Echinococcosis in Afghanistan: Filling a National data gap.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Observational
- Zoonotic potential of bovine Sarcocystis species: a challenge for public health and meat inspection.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2026Review
- The history of giardiasis.Parasitology research · 2025Review
- High frequency of DNA detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025Article
- The early human interferon gamma response to Toxoplasma gondii is driven by Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell sensing of host phosphoantigens and subsequent NK-cell activation.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Article
- Different kinetics of humoral response against individual antigens in the ovine model ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Presence ofParasitology · 2024Review
- Environmental contamination with feces of free-roaming dogs and the risk of transmission of Echinococcus and Taenia species in urban regions of southeastern Iran.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Article
- Farmers' response to maize production risks in Cameroon: An application of the criticality risk matrix model.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Aptamer-Based Technologies for Parasite Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Introduction to the Special Issue: Microbiological Safety and Quality of Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Vaccines as a Strategy to Control Trichinellosis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- A cloth-based hybridization array system for rapid detection of the food- and waterborne protozoan parasitesFood and waterborne parasitology · 2021Article
- Echinococcoses in Iran, Turkey, and Pakistan: Old Diseases in the New Millennium.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a time of increasing threats and decreasing financial resources, monitoring and controlling all possible foodborne hazards at the same time and to the same extent has become more challenging than ever. Therefore, attention is increasingly being paid to the so-called "risk ranking" methods that enable decision makers to focus on the most important foodborne hazards - even when time is limited and knowledge incomplete. In this review paper, we provide an overview of the most common quantitative methods and metrics used for ranking the risks associated with foodborne parasites and present the state of the art on risk ranking exercises for foodborne parasites. A number of risk ranking metrics and methods are available, ranging from simple approaches that can be used to assess the health or economic impact of a foodborne parasitic disease, to more complicated but more comprehensive multi-criteria assessments. For health impact assessment, measures of population health such as disease occurrence and number of deaths; Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) measuring the healthy life years lost; and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) measuring the number of life years lived in optimal health, are described. For economic impact assessment, applied approaches that measure the cost-of-illness from a societal perspective and stated preference methods are outlined. Finally, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which can be used to integrate multiple metrics and criteria into a single ranking, is described. These risk ranking methods for foodborne parasites are increasingly performed to aid priority setting at global, regional, and national levels. As different stakeholders have their own prioritization objectives and beliefs, the outcome of such exercises is necessarily context-dependent. Therefore, when designing a risk ranking exercise for foodborne parasites, it is important to choose the metrics and methods, as well as what to rank, in the light of the predefined context of the question being addressed and the target audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.