Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095638›Full record

ReviewFood and waterborne parasitology

Risk ranking of foodborne parasites: State of the art.

Brecht Devleesschauwer, Martijn Bouwknegt, Pierre Dorny, Sarah Gabriël, Arie H Havelaar, Sophie Quoilin, Lucy J Robertson, Niko Speybroeck, Paul R Torgerson, Joke W B van der Giessen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food and waterborne parasitology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. The history of giardiasis.Parasitology research · 2025
    Review
  8. High frequency of DNA detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Presence ofParasitology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Aptamer-Based Technologies for Parasite Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Vaccines as a Strategy to Control Trichinellosis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brecht DevleesschauwerDepartment of Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health (WIV-ISP), Brussels, Belgium.
Martijn BouwknegtGroup Quality Assurance/R&D, Vion, Boxtel, The Netherlands.
Pierre DornyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sarah GabriëlDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Arie H HavelaarEmerging Pathogens Institute, Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, Animal Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sophie QuoilinDepartment of Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health (WIV-ISP), Brussels, Belgium.
Lucy J RobertsonParasitology, Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Adamstuen Campus, Oslo, Norway.
Niko SpeybroeckInstitute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Paul R TorgersonSection of Epidemiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Joke W B van der GiessenCentre for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Chiara TrevisanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a time of increasing threats and decreasing financial resources, monitoring and controlling all possible foodborne hazards at the same time and to the same extent has become more challenging than ever. Therefore, attention is increasingly being paid to the so-called "risk ranking" methods that enable decision makers to focus on the most important foodborne hazards - even when time is limited and knowledge incomplete. In this review paper, we provide an overview of the most common quantitative methods and metrics used for ranking the risks associated with foodborne parasites and present the state of the art on risk ranking exercises for foodborne parasites. A number of risk ranking metrics and methods are available, ranging from simple approaches that can be used to assess the health or economic impact of a foodborne parasitic disease, to more complicated but more comprehensive multi-criteria assessments. For health impact assessment, measures of population health such as disease occurrence and number of deaths; Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) measuring the healthy life years lost; and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) measuring the number of life years lived in optimal health, are described. For economic impact assessment, applied approaches that measure the cost-of-illness from a societal perspective and stated preference methods are outlined. Finally, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which can be used to integrate multiple metrics and criteria into a single ranking, is described. These risk ranking methods for foodborne parasites are increasingly performed to aid priority setting at global, regional, and national levels. As different stakeholders have their own prioritization objectives and beliefs, the outcome of such exercises is necessarily context-dependent. Therefore, when designing a risk ranking exercise for foodborne parasites, it is important to choose the metrics and methods, as well as what to rank, in the light of the predefined context of the question being addressed and the target audience.

Indexed as

Cost-of-illnessDALY, Disability-Adjusted Life YearDisability-adjusted life yearsFAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFoodborne parasitesGBD, Global Burden of DiseaseMCDA, Multi-Criteria Decision AnalysisMulti-criteria decision analysisPriority settingQALY, Quality-Adjusted Life YearSMPH, Summary Measure of Population HealthWHO, World Health OrganizationWTA, Willingness-to-acceptWTP, Willingness-to-payYLD, Year Lived with DisabilityYLL, Year of Life Lost

Identifiers

PMID32095638
PMCPMC7034010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.