Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095628›Full record

ReviewFood and waterborne parasitology2019

Prevention and mitigation of congenital toxoplasmosis. Economic costs and benefits in diverse settings.

Branko Bobić, Isabelle Villena, Eileen Stillwaggon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food and waterborne parasitology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Routine antenatal toxoplasmosis screening, is it necessary?Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. The Impact of LatentMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mathematical modelling ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2021
    Review
  17. National perinatal survey demonstrates a decreasing seroprevalence ofEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Review
  18. Toxoplasmosis: Overview from a One Health perspective.Food and waterborne parasitology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Branko BobićInstitute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Centre of Excellence for Food- and Vector-borne Zoonoses, National Reference Laboratory for Toxoplasmosis, Serbia.
Isabelle VillenaEA 7510, UFR Médecine, University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, National Reference Center on Toxoplasmosis, Hospital Reims, France.
Eileen StillwaggonDepartment of Economics, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA, USA.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRGettysburg College · USUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital toxoplasmosis (CT), the result of a primary infection of pregnant women with

Indexed as

Congenital toxoplasmosisCT, congenital toxoplasmosisEconomic benefitsEconomic costsPreventionPS, pyrimethamine/sulfadiazineScreening

Identifiers

PMID32095628
PMCPMC7034037
OpenAlexW2946885476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.