Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095578›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2018

Breast cancer patients report reduced sensitivity and pain using a barrier film during radiotherapy - A Danish intra-patient randomized multicentre study.

Pia Krause Møller, Karina Olling, Martin Berg, Inger Habæk, Bente Haislund, Anne-Mette Iversen, Marianne Ewertz, Ebbe L Lorenzen, Carsten Brink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mepitel Film for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Mepitel film for the prevention and treatment of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Barrier Films and Dressings for the Prevention of Acute Radiation Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Radiation dermatitis assessment tools used in breast cancer: A systematic review of measurement properties.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Mepitel film for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  20. Patient-reported experience with the use of Mepitel Film for prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pia Krause MøllerDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Karina OllingDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, Denmark.
Martin BergDepartment of Medical Physics, Vejle Hospital, Denmark.
Inger HabækDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Bente HaislundDepartment of Oncology, Herning Hospital, Denmark.
Anne-Mette IversenDepartment of Oncology, Århus University Hospital, Denmark.
Marianne EwertzDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Ebbe L LorenzenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Carsten BrinkDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKVejle Sygehus · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKRegionshospitalet Herning · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRadiodermatitis is a well-known toxicity of radiotherapy and barrier film has been shown to reduce the severity of radiodermatitis. We have validated prior findings in a Danish cohort, using a similar barrier film and patient reported outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methods101 Danish breast cancer patients were included at three radiotherapy centres. Based on randomization either the lateral or medial part of their chest was covered by Mepitel film; making the patients their own control. The primary endpoint was patient reported symptoms and experience. A secondary endpoint was radiotherapy staff evaluation of dermatitis.

resultsWithin the skin area covered by film, the patients reported a statistical significant lower level of pain (

conclusionsPatients reported reduced symptoms from the skin with Mepitel Film and the majority would have preferred film as a standard offer to cover their entire treatment area. Especially women treated after mastectomy had a significantly lower level of radiodermatitis and preferred the film over standard care.

Indexed as

Breast cancerMepitel filmPRORadiodermatitisRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32095578
PMCPMC7033759
OpenAlexW2809431035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.