Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095545›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2019

Robust dose planning objectives for mesorectal radiotherapy of early stage rectal cancer - A multicentre dose planning study.

Ane L Appelt, Ellen M Kerkhof, Lars Nyvang, Ernst C Harderwijk, Natalie L Abbott, Mark Teo, Femke P Peters, Camilla J S Kronborg, Karen-Lise G Spindler, David Sebag-Montefiore and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02945566 (STAR-TREC), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02945566 phase2 / phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

STAR-TREC: Can we Save the Rectum by Watchful Waiting or TransAnal Surgery Following (Chemo)Radiotherapy Versus Total Mesorectal Excision for Early REctal Cancer?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BirminghamRan2017 to 2028Enrolled380ConditionsAdenocarcinoma of the RectumArmsStandard TME surgery, Long course concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine and radiotherapy, Short course radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ane L AppeltLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds and Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Ellen M KerkhofDepartment of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Lars NyvangDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ernst C HarderwijkDepartment of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Natalie L AbbottRadiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Mark TeoLeeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Femke P PetersDepartment of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Camilla J S KronborgDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karen-Lise G SpindlerDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
David Sebag-MontefioreLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds and Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Corrie A M MarijnenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
STAR-TREC collaborative group

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeOrgan preservation strategies are increasingly being explored for early rectal cancer. This requires revision of target volumes according to disease stage, as well as new guidelines for treatment planning. We conducted an international, multicentre dose planning study to develop robust planning objectives for modern radiotherapy of a novel mesorectal-only target volume, as implemented in the STAR-TReC trial (NCT02945566). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe published literature was used to establish relevant dose levels for organ at risk (OAR) plan optimisation. Ten representative patients with early rectal cancer were identified. Treatment scans had mesorectal target volumes as well as bowel cavity, bladder and femoral heads outlined, and were circulated amongst the three participating institutions. Each institution produced plans for short course (SCRT, 5 × 5 Gy) and long course (LCRT, 25 × 2 Gy) treatment, using volumetric modulated arc therapy on different dose planning systems. Optimisation objectives for OARs were established by determining dose metric objectives achievable for ≥90% of plans.

resultsSixty plans, all fulfilling target coverage criteria, were produced. The planning results and literature review suggested optimisation objectives for SCRT:

conclusionWe utilized a multicentre planning study approach to develop robust planning objectives for mesorectal radiotherapy for early rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Intensity-modulatedOrgan preservationRadiotherapyRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32095545
PMCPMC7033757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.