Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095438›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental vaccine research2020

The potential efficacy of the E2-subunit vaccine to protect pigs against different genotypes of classical swine fever virus circulating in Vietnam.

Ha Thi Thanh Tran, Duc Anh Truong, Viet Duc Ly, Hao Thi Vu, Tuan Van Hoang, Chinh Thi Nguyen, Nhu Thi Chu, Vinh The Nguyen, Duyen Thuy Nguyen, Kohtaro Miyazawa and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ha Thi Thanh TranDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-8815
Duc Anh TruongDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2472-8165
Viet Duc LyDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hao Thi VuDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tuan Van HoangDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Chinh Thi NguyenDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nhu Thi ChuDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Vinh The NguyenDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Duyen Thuy NguyenDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Kohtaro MiyazawaNational Institute of Animal Health, The National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takehiro KokuhoNational Institute of Animal Health, The National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hoang Vu DangDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR), Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0006-7902
National Institute of Veterinary Research · VNNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo date, many kinds of classical swine fever (CSF) vaccines have been developed to protect against this disease. However, the efficacy of these vaccines to protect the pig against field CSF strains needs to be considered, based on circulating strains of classical swine fever virus (CSFV). MATERIALS AND

methodsRecombinant E2-CSFV protein produced by baculovirus/insect cell system was analyzed by western blots and immunoperoxidase monolayer assay. The effect of CSFV-E2 subunit vaccines was evaluated in experimental pigs with three genotypes of CSFV challenge. Anti-E2 specific and neutralizing antibodies in experimental pigs were analyzed by blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and neutralization peroxidize-linked assay.

resultsThe data showed that CSFV VN91-E2 subunit vaccine provided clinical protection in pigs against three different genotypes of CSFV without noticeable clinical signs, symptoms, and mortality. In addition, no CSFV was isolated from the spleen of the vaccinated pigs. However, the unvaccinated pigs exhibited high clinical scores and the successful virus isolation from spleen. These results showed that the E2-specific and neutralizing antibodies induced by VN91-E2 antigen appeared at day 24 after first boost and a significant increase was observed at day 28 (p<0.01). This response reached a peak at day 35 and continued until day 63 when compared to controls. Importantly, VN91-E2 induced E2-specific and neutralizing antibodies protected experimental pigs against high virulence of CSFVs circulating in Vietnam, including genotype 1.1, 2.1, and 2.2.

conclusionThese findings also suggested that CSFV VN91-E2 subunit vaccine could be a promising vaccine candidate for the control and prevention of CSFV in Vietnam.

Indexed as

Classical swine feverGenotypeVaccineVietnam

Identifiers

PMID32095438
PMCPMC7024730
OpenAlexW3005980789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.