Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095397›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020

Plastic Surgery on YouTube.

Mohammed A Almarghoub, Muath A Alghareeb, AlAnoud K Alhammad, Haya F Alotaibi, Abdullah E Kattan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. 'How to Botox' on YouTube: Influence and Beauty Procedures in the Era of User-Generated Content.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed A AlmarghoubPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centrer, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muath A AlghareebDivision of Plastic Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
AlAnoud K AlhammadDivision of Plastic Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Haya F AlotaibiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah E KattanDivision of Plastic Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SASecurity Forces Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

YouTube is the most accessed video website in the world. It hosts a variety of medical content. Plastic surgery-related content on YouTube has not been investigated before. In this study, we analyzed the most prevalent plastic surgery-related content available on YouTube.

methodsSearch terms were selected to cover the broad topics of plastic surgery. The top 20 most-viewed videos returned for each search term were analyzed. The videos were classified by the type of content, authorship, number of views, and number of likes. Data were collected and analyzed using Microsoft Excel (2016) program.

resultsOut of the 280 videos analyzed, "patient experience" was the most prevalent content type. Thirty percent of the analyzed videos were uploaded by medical centers, and 29% were uploaded from personal accounts. Educational video content constituted 6% of the total videos analyzed. Entertainment was the most prevalent (60%) content type returned when "plastic surgery" was used as the search term.

conclusionsYouTube is an underutilized social media platform by plastic surgeons. The entertainment industry is taking advantage of the social media platform to attract and gain millions of views. Educational videos are low in number and quality.

Identifiers

PMID32095397
PMCPMC7015617
OpenAlexW3003733052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.