ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
From Open to Robotic-assisted Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap Harvest.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Preliminary evaluation of pectoralis major fascia use in robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with gel implant: a retrospective comparative cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Review
- The evolution of digital surgery and the role of the surgeon.JPRAS open · 2025Review
- Robotics in Implant-Based and Autologous Breast Reconstruction.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2023Review
- Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery: Recent Evidence with Comparative Clinical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The latissimus dorsi muscle is the largest muscle in the body. The classic open flap harvest technique of this muscle results in a long posterolateral thoracic vertical oblique incision that can leave an unappealing scar. The minimally invasive robotic approach has the potential to reduce scar length and to overcome technical limitations of endoscopic techniques.
methodsSix robotically assisted latissimus dorsi muscle flaps were harvested by a single surgeon. One was used as reversed turnover pedicled flap based on lumbar perforators for lumbosacral bone coverage, another flap was transposed for a Poland syndrome anterior axillary line reconstruction, and the remaining 4 were dissected as free flaps for upper and lower limb reconstruction. All 6 procedures used a short 5-cm axillary crease incision along the posterior axillary fold and two 8-mm port incisions for robotic access.
resultsThe first robotic flap harvest was converted to the classic open technique due to malposition of the 2 lower port incisions too close to the latissimus dorsi anterior border. The 5 other flaps were successfully transferred without flap or donor site complications. The average flap dissection time was 110 minutes; latter surgeries took less time than the early surgeries as the surgeon became more familiar with the robotic system and due to the use of a newer system.
conclusionRobotic-assisted latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvest is a safe, reproducible, and effective tool that offers precise dissection control and that leaves a minimal thoracic scar.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.