Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095392›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020

From Open to Robotic-assisted Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap Harvest.

Alessandro Fouarge, Nicolas Cuylits

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandro FouargePlastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas CuylitsPlastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Creative Commons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latissimus dorsi muscle is the largest muscle in the body. The classic open flap harvest technique of this muscle results in a long posterolateral thoracic vertical oblique incision that can leave an unappealing scar. The minimally invasive robotic approach has the potential to reduce scar length and to overcome technical limitations of endoscopic techniques.

methodsSix robotically assisted latissimus dorsi muscle flaps were harvested by a single surgeon. One was used as reversed turnover pedicled flap based on lumbar perforators for lumbosacral bone coverage, another flap was transposed for a Poland syndrome anterior axillary line reconstruction, and the remaining 4 were dissected as free flaps for upper and lower limb reconstruction. All 6 procedures used a short 5-cm axillary crease incision along the posterior axillary fold and two 8-mm port incisions for robotic access.

resultsThe first robotic flap harvest was converted to the classic open technique due to malposition of the 2 lower port incisions too close to the latissimus dorsi anterior border. The 5 other flaps were successfully transferred without flap or donor site complications. The average flap dissection time was 110 minutes; latter surgeries took less time than the early surgeries as the surgeon became more familiar with the robotic system and due to the use of a newer system.

conclusionRobotic-assisted latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvest is a safe, reproducible, and effective tool that offers precise dissection control and that leaves a minimal thoracic scar.

Identifiers

PMID32095392
PMCPMC7015614
OpenAlexW3002034989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.