Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095355›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

The community composition variation of Russulaceae associated with the

Pengjie Xing, Yang Xu, Tingting Gao, Guanlin Li, Jijiang Zhou, Mengle Xie, Ruiqing Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Diverse Mycorrizal Morphology ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Fungal-Bacterial Networks in the Habitat of SongRong (Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pengjie Xing *Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Yang Xu *Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Tingting GaoEngineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Guanlin LiEngineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Jijiang ZhouEngineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Mengle XieEngineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Ruiqing JiEngineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost species of the Russulaceae are ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi, which are widely distributed in different types of forest ecology and drive important ecological and economic functions. Little is known about the composition variation of the Russulaceae fungal community aboveground and in the root and soil during the growing season (June-October) from a

methodsTo achieve this, the Sanger sequencing method was used to identify the Russulaceae aboveground, and the high-throughput sequencing method was used to analyze the species composition of the Russulaceae in the root and soil. Moreover, we used the Pearson correlation analysis, the redundancy analysis and the multivariate linear regression analysis to analyze which factors significantly affected the composition and distribution of the Russulaceae fungal community.

resultsA total of 56 species of Russulaceae were detected in the

Indexed as

Biotic factorsClimate factorsCommunity compositionQuercus mongolicaRussulaceaeSoil factors

Identifiers

PMID32095355
PMCPMC7023826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.