ReviewGastroenterology research2020
Colon Cancer: A Clinician's Perspective in 2019.
Review in Gastroenterology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
120 citing papers in PubMed, 266 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Colon Cancer Organoid-on-a-Chip Model for In Vitro Therapy Assessment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Comprehensive identification of three key genes and three key DNA methylation CpG sites associated with prognosis and prediction in colon adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Palbociclib targets β-catenin for degradation and synergizes with KRAS or ERK5 inhibition in colorectal cancer preclinical models.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- The p53 Isoforms as Potential Biomarkers in Different Cancer Entities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Is there hope for HER2-positive colorectal cancer with Trastuzumab? A review of current evidence.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- A Novel Prognostic Signature Composed of Autophagy and Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: Comprehensive Analysis of Bulk and Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Anti-cancer Potential of Scopoletin Derivatives Across Diverse Cancer Cell Lines: A Comprehensive Review.Current drug discovery technologies · 2026Review
- The Factors Affecting the Screening of New Colorectal Cancer Cases Between 2020 and 2022 in Isfahan Province.International journal of preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Observational
- Anticancer Potential of Wogonin: A Comprehensive Treatise.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Overcoming colorectal cancer and cancer stem cell resistance with photodynamic therapy: new frontiers in oncology.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Review
- Anticancer efficacy of albumin nanoparticles co-loaded with silver nanoparticles and 5FU in animal model of colon cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Colonic Aging and Colorectal Cancer: An Unignorable Interplay and Its Translational Implications.Biology · 2025Review
- Gossypin induces apoptosis and autophagy via the MAPK/JNK pathway in HT‑29 human colorectal cancer cells.International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Surgical outcomes of curative intent management in emergency vs. elective colon cancer: A retrospective single center study.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025Article
- Inhibition of colorectal carcinogenesis by sunitinib malate: disruption of the IL-6/STAT3/c-MYC/TWIST/MMP2 autocrine signaling axis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- In vitro effects of crocin on the possible anticancer properties of Lactococcus lactis against colorectal adenocarcinoma cells.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Expression of Prooncogenic Nuclear Receptor 4A (NR4A)-Regulated Genes β1-Integrin and G9a Inhibited by Dual NR4A1/2 Ligands.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Identification of a PANoptosis-related long noncoding rna risk signature for prognosis and immunology in colon adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colon cancer is a common preventable cancer. With the adoption of widespread colon cancer screening in the developed countries, the incidence and mortality of colon cancer have decreased in the targeted population. But unfortunately, the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) have been increasing over the last 25 years in the young adults below the age of 50. There is disparity in benefit, i.e. reduction in risk of death between right-sided and left-sided colon cancer by screening colonoscopy. The reason could be multifactorial and various measures have been taken to decrease this disparity. Although most of the screened populations are average risk individuals, a minority of the population have various risk factors for developing colon cancer and need to follow specific colon cancer screening guidelines. Gene mutations (adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), deleted in colon cancer (DCC), K-ras, p53, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF), mismatch repair genes) and microsatellite instability lead to the development of colon cancer. Although various non-invasive methods of colon cancer screening are now available, colonoscopy remains the gold standard of colon cancer screening and adenoma detection rate is now being used as the quality metrics in screening colonoscopy. Although Multi-Society Task Force (MSTF) and American College of Physicians (ACP) recommend initiating screening colonoscopy at age 50 years in all individuals except African Americans who should begin screening colonoscopy at age 45 years, the American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends initiating screening colonoscopy at age 45 years in all individuals irrespective of race and ethnicity. Low-volume split-dose prep has been found to be as effective as high-volume split-dose prep and more tolerable to patients with increased compliance. Boston bowel preparation scale is recommended to measure the quality of colon cleansing. CRC is curative if it is diagnosed at an early stage but various palliative treatment options (endoscopic, oncologic and surgical) are available in advanced stages of this cancer. Adequate number of lymph node assessment during surgery is essential in accurate staging of CRC. Checkpoint inhibitors have been found to have dramatic response and durable clinical benefit in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic CRC. Different genetic and immune-oncologic research trials are ongoing for early detection and better management of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.