Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095115›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2020

Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure novice nurses' perceived ability to provide care in acute situations - PCAS.

Anders Sterner, Emma Säfström, Lina Palmér, Nerrolyn Ramstrand, Magnus Andersson Hagiwara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anders Sterner1Faculty of Caring Sciences, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, SE-501 90 Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2430-5285
Emma Säfström2Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Lina Palmér1Faculty of Caring Sciences, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, SE-501 90 Borås, Sweden.
Nerrolyn Ramstrand3CHILD research group, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, 551 11 Jönköping, Sweden.
Magnus Andersson Hagiwara4Centre for Prehospital Research, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, 501 90 Borås, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovice nurses need to be better prepared to provide care in acute situations. There is currently no validated scale specifically measuring nurses' perception of their ability to provide care in acute situations. The aim of this study was to develop and examine the psychometric properties of a scale that measures novice nurses self-reported perception of ability to provide care in acute situations.

methodDevelopment and test of the psychometric properties of the Perception to Care in Acute Situations (PCAS) scale. Items were generated from interviews with novice nurses (

resultThe PCAS scale contains 17 items grouped into three factors. EFA demonstrated a clean three factor logic construct solution with no cross-loadings, high correlation for the total scale in both Cronbach's alfa 0.90 and ordinal alpha 0.92.

conclusionsThe PCAS scale has proven to have acceptable validity. The factors," confidence in provision of care", "communication" and "patient perspective" are likely to be important aspects of providing care in acute situations. Additional testing of the PCAS is needed to conclude if it is sensitive enough to evaluate interventions aimed at improving novice nurses competence and suitable as a guide for reflection for novice nurses.

Indexed as

AcuteEducationEducational measurementNursingPsychometricsSelf report

Identifiers

PMID32095115
PMCPMC7027289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.