Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095114›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2020

The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death.

Barbara Pesut, Sally Thorne, Catharine J Schiller, Madeleine Greig, Josette Roussel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying System can Enable Healthcare Serial Killing.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Evolving Context of MAID-Related Communications for Registered Nurses in Canada.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evolving strategies to relieve suffering at end-of-life.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara Pesut1Canada Research Chair in Health, Ethics, and Diversity, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 1147 Research Road, Okanagan, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7 Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1063-7190
Sally Thorne2University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5 Canada.
Catharine J Schiller3University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9 Canada.
Madeleine Greig1Canada Research Chair in Health, Ethics, and Diversity, University of British Columbia Okanagan, 1147 Research Road, Okanagan, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7 Canada.
Josette Roussel4Policy, Advocacy and Strategy, Canadian Nurses Association, 50 Driveway, Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1E2 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June, 2016. The Canadian government's decision to legislate assisted dying, an approach that requires a high degree of obligation, precision, and delegation, has resulted in unique challenges for health care and for nursing practice. The purpose of this study was to better understand the implications of a legislated approach to assisted death for nurses' experiences and nursing practice.

methodsThe study used a qualitative approach guided by Interpretive Description. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 59 registered nurses and nurse practitioners. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and managed using qualitative analysis software. Analysis followed a procedure of data immersion, open coding, constant comparative analysis, and the construction of a thematic and interpretive account.

resultsNurses in this study described great variability in how MAiD had been enacted in their work context and the practice supports available to guide their practice. The development of systems to support MAiD, or lack thereof, was largely driven by persons in influential leadership positions. Workplaces that supported a range of nurses' moral responses to MAiD were most effective in supporting nurses' well-being during this impactful change in practice. Participants cited the importance of teamwork in providing high quality MAiD-related care; although, many worked without the benefit of a team. Nursing work related to MAiD was highly complex, largely because of the need for patient-centered care in systems that were not always organized to support such care. In the absence of adequate practice supports, some nurses were choosing to limit their involvement in MAiD.

conclusionsData obtained in this study suggested that some workplace contexts still lack the necessary supports for nurses to confidently meet the precision required of a legislated approach to MAiD. Without accessible palliative care, sufficient providers, a supportive team, practice supports, and a context that allowed nurses to have a range of responses to MAiD, nurses felt they were legally and morally at risk. Nurses seeking to provide the compassionate care consistent with such a momentous moment in patients' lives, without suitable supports, find themselves caught between the proverbial rock and hard place.

Indexed as

(3-10) Assisted deathAssisted suicideEuthanasiaLegislationMedical assistance in dyingNursing practicePalliative care

Identifiers

PMID32095114
PMCPMC7025406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.