ArticleVeterinary world2019
Article in Veterinary world, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro Characterization of Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus Species Isolated from Boza Traditional Non-Alcoholic Fermented Turkish Beverage.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Hypoglycemic, Antioxidant Activities, and Probiotic Characteristics ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antineoplastic with DNA fragmentation assay and anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory with gene expression activity of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from local Egyptian milk products.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Tackling salmonellosis: A comprehensive exploration of risks factors, impacts, and solutions.Open veterinary journal · 2024Review
- The novel probiotic preparation based on Lactobacillus spp. mixture on the intestinal bacterial community structure of Cherry Valley duck.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- FolE gene expression for folic acid productivity from optimized and characterized probiotic Lactobacillus delbrueckii.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimMATERIALS AND
methodsEleven samples of raw cow's milk, five samples of breast milk, and six infant stool samples were taken. From these samples, strains of
resultsOut of the 22 samples collected, 20 strains of
conclusionFrom this study,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.