Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32095024›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers2020

Image Reconstruction: From Sparsity to Data-adaptive Methods and Machine Learning.

Saiprasad Ravishankar, Jong Chul Ye, Jeffrey A Fessler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
23.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Scan-Adaptive MRI Undersampling Using Neighbor-based Optimization (SUNO).IEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Spatial Adaptive Selection using Binary Conditional Autoregressive Model with Application to Brain-Computer Interface.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Limited-Angle Tomography Using a Neural Network as the Objective Function.International journal of biomedical research & practice · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Motion-robust free-running volumetric cardiovascular MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Saiprasad RavishankarDepartments of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824 USA.
Jong Chul YeDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering and Department of Mathematical Sciences at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, South Korea.
Jeffrey A FesslerDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109 USA.
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRMichigan State University · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

High SNR Functional Brain Imaging using Oscillating Steady State MRIU01EB026977 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NOLL, DOUGLAS C · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Advanced breast tomosynthesis reconstruction for improved cancer diagnosisR01CA214981 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHAN, HEANG-PING, FESSLER, JEFFREY A · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Accelerated statistical image reconstruction methods for X-ray CTU01EB018753 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FESSLER, JEFFREY A · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Fast Functional MRI with Sparse Sampling and Model-Based ReconstructionR01EB023618 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FESSLER, JEFFREY A, NOLL, DOUGLAS C · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214981NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023618NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB018753NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB026977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of medical image reconstruction has seen roughly four types of methods. The first type tended to be analytical methods, such as filtered back-projection (FBP) for X-ray computed tomography (CT) and the inverse Fourier transform for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), based on simple mathematical models for the imaging systems. These methods are typically fast, but have suboptimal properties such as poor resolution-noise trade-off for CT. A second type is iterative reconstruction methods based on more complete models for the imaging system physics and, where appropriate, models for the sensor statistics. These iterative methods improved image quality by reducing noise and artifacts. The FDA-approved methods among these have been based on relatively simple regularization models. A third type of methods has been designed to accommodate modified data acquisition methods, such as reduced sampling in MRI and CT to reduce scan time or radiation dose. These methods typically involve mathematical image models involving assumptions such as

Indexed as

Compressed sensingDeep learningDictionary learningEfficient algorithmsImage reconstructionMachine learningMRIMulti-layer modelsNonconvex optimizationPETSparse and low-rank modelsSPECTStructured modelsTransform learningX-ray CT

Identifiers

PMID32095024
PMCPMC7039447
OpenAlexW2942199805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.