ArticleNature2018
Data visualization tools drive interactivity and reproducibility in online publishing.
Article in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-scale validation study of an improved semiautonomous urine cytology assessment tool: AutoParis-X.Cancer cytopathology · 2023Article
- BioVisReport: A Markdown-based lightweight website builder for reproducible and interactive visualization of results from peer-reviewed publications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Mesmerize is a dynamically adaptable user-friendly analysis platform for 2D and 3D calcium imaging data.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes Among Life Scientists Toward Reproducibility Within Journal Articles: A Research Survey.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021Article
- 3dRS, a Web-Based Tool to Share Interactive Representations of 3D Biomolecular Structures and Molecular Dynamics Trajectories.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- ideal: an R/Bioconductor package for interactive differential expression analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- Interpretation of differential gene expression results of RNA-seq data: review and integration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Open collaborative writing with Manubot.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- IRIS-EDA: An integrated RNA-Seq interpretation system for gene expression data analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- ColiCoords: A Python package for the analysis of bacterial fluorescence microscopy data.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32094856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.