Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32094425›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Effect of decalcification protocols on immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses of bone samples.

Elodie Miquelestorena-Standley, Marie-Lise Jourdan, Christine Collin, Corinne Bouvier, Frédérique Larousserie, Sébastien Aubert, Anne Gomez-Brouchet, Jean-Marc Guinebretière, Matthias Tallegas, Bénédicte Brulin and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Elodie Miquelestorena-StandleyCHRU de Tours, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Tours, France. elodie.standley@univ-tours.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6375-3734
Marie-Lise JourdanCHRU de Tours, Plateforme de Génétique Moléculaire des Cancers, Tours, France.
Christine CollinCHRU de Tours, Plateforme de Génétique Moléculaire des Cancers, Tours, France.
Corinne BouvierCHU de Marseille La Timone, Laboratoire d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Marseille, France.
Frédérique LarousserieHôpital Cochin, Laboratoire d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Paris, France.
Sébastien AubertCHU de Lille, Laboratoire d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Lille, France.
Anne Gomez-BrouchetCRB Cancer IUCT-oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Marc GuinebretièreHôpital Curie, Laboratoire d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Paris, France.
Matthias TallegasCHRU de Tours, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Tours, France.
Bénédicte BrulinINSERM UMR 1238, Laboratoire d'étude des sarcomes osseux et remodelage des tissus calcifiés, Nantes, France.
Louis-Romée Le NailUniversité de Tours, PRES Centre-Val de Loire Université, Tours, France.
Anne TalletCHRU de Tours, Plateforme de Génétique Moléculaire des Cancers, Tours, France.
François Le LoarerInstitut Bergonié, Service d'anatomie pathologique, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8582-9819
Jessica MassiereInstitut Bergonié, Service d'anatomie pathologique, Bordeaux, France.
Christine GalantCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Laboratoire d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Bruxelles, Belgique.
Gonzague de PinieuxCHRU de Tours, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Tours, France.
Université de Tours · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRInstitut Bergonié · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpital Cochin · FRInserm · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRPhysique des Cellules et Cancers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of osteocartilaginous pathologies depends on morphological examination and immunohistochemical and molecular biology analyses. Decalcification is required before tissue processing, but available protocols often lead to altered proteins and nucleic acids, and thus compromise the diagnosis. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of different methods of decalcification on histomolecular analyses required for diagnosis and to recommend an optimal protocol for processing these samples in routine practice. We prospectively submitted 35 tissue samples to different decalcification procedures with hydrochloric acid, formic acid, and EDTA, in short, overnight and long cycles for 1 to >10 cycles. Preservation of protein integrity was examined by immunohistochemistry, and quality of nucleic acids was estimated after extraction (DNA and RNA concentrations, 260/280 ratios, PCR cycle thresholds), analysis of DNA mutations (high-resolution melting) or amplifications (PCR, in situ hybridization), and detection of fusion transcripts (RT-PCR, in situ hybridization). Hydrochloric acid- and long-term formic acid-based decalcification induced false-negative results on immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. EDTA and short-term formic acid-based decalcification (<5 cycles of 6 h each) did not alter antigenicity and allowed for detection of gene mutations, amplifications or even fusion transcripts. EDTA showed superiority for in situ hybridization techniques. According to these results and our institutional experience, we propose recommendations for decalcification of bone samples, from biopsies to surgical specimens.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBone DiseasesDecalcification TechniqueEdetic AcidFormatesHumansHydrochloric AcidImmunohistochemistryNucleic AcidsEdetic AcidFormatesformic acidHydrochloric AcidNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID32094425
OpenAlexW3008513690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.