Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020
Evaluation of primary care 6- to 8-week hip check for diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a 15-year observational cohort study.
Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology and Screening of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Europe: A Scoping Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2024Review
- Feeling the clunk: Managing and attributing uncertainty in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infancy.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2022Article
- Modified Pemberton Pelvic Osteotomy Through Inner Ilium Approach for Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Understanding physician behaviour in the 6-8 weeks hip check in primary care: a qualitative study using the COM-B.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Article
- Parents' expectations and experiences of the 6-week baby check: a qualitative study in primary care.BJGP open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current 6- to 8-week Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE) clinical assessment is a current standard hip-screening test in the community (England) to detect developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
aimTo assess the value of the primary care 6- to 8-week clinical hip examination for the diagnosis of DDH. DESIGN AND
settingA single-centre 15-year observational cohort study at a district general hospital between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2010.
methodThose referred by the GP or community practitioner with suspected instability or abnormality of the hip joint (DDH), were clinically and sonographically examined in a specialist hip-screening clinic. Modified Graf Type III and IV, and radiological irreducible hip dislocation were considered to be 'pathological' hips. Screening failures were defined as those who had not been identified by this primary care screening assessment (but had irreducible hip dislocation). Secondary univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine which clinical findings are predictive of instability.
resultsOver the study period, there were 70 071 infants who underwent the 6- to 8-week clinical hip assessment. In the specialist hip-screening clinic, six (from the 170 referred) were diagnosed with pathological DDH. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the 6- to 8-week clinical hip assessment were 16.7%, 99.8%, 3.5%, and 100.0%, respectively. A multivariable model showed a positive Ortolani manoeuvre to be the sole independent predictor of instability at 6 to 8 weeks.
conclusionThis 15-year study highlights the limitations of a hip check at 6 to 8 weeks. These findings support the reassessment of the national guidelines for this aspect of the NIPE DDH screening programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.