Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32094181›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Dinoflagellates with relic endosymbiont nuclei as models for elucidating organellogenesis.

Chihiro Sarai, Goro Tanifuji, Takuro Nakayama, Ryoma Kamikawa, Kazuya Takahashi, Euki Yazaki, Eriko Matsuo, Hideaki Miyashita, Ken-Ichiro Ishida, Mitsunori Iwataki and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How to upgrade stolen organelles into permanent plastids: A comparative transcriptomic perspective.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ImprovedMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chihiro SaraiGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Yamagata University, 990-8560 Yamagata, Japan.
Goro TanifujiFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 305-8572 Tsukuba, Japan; gorot@kahaku.go.jp iwataki@anesc.u-tokyo.ac.jp yuji@ccs.tsukuba.ac.jp.
Takuro NakayamaCenter for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 305-8577 Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-0156
Ryoma KamikawaGraduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, 606-8501 Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuya TakahashiGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Yamagata University, 990-8560 Yamagata, Japan.
Euki YazakiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Eriko MatsuoGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 305-8572 Tsukuba, Japan.
Hideaki MiyashitaGraduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, 606-8501 Kyoto, Japan.
Ken-Ichiro IshidaFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 305-8572 Tsukuba, Japan.
Mitsunori IwatakiGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Yamagata University, 990-8560 Yamagata, Japan; gorot@kahaku.go.jp iwataki@anesc.u-tokyo.ac.jp yuji@ccs.tsukuba.ac.jp.
Yuji InagakiCenter for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 305-8577 Tsukuba, Japan; gorot@kahaku.go.jp iwataki@anesc.u-tokyo.ac.jp yuji@ccs.tsukuba.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-0101-8483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleomorphs are relic endosymbiont nuclei so far found only in two algal groups, cryptophytes and chlorarachniophytes, which have been studied to model the evolutionary process of integrating an endosymbiont alga into a host-governed plastid (organellogenesis). However, past studies suggest that DNA transfer from the endosymbiont to host nuclei had already ceased in both cryptophytes and chlorarachniophytes, implying that the organellogenesis at the genetic level has been completed in the two systems. Moreover, we have yet to pinpoint the closest free-living relative of the endosymbiotic alga engulfed by the ancestral chlorarachniophyte or cryptophyte, making it difficult to infer how organellogenesis altered the endosymbiont genome. To counter the above issues, we need novel nucleomorph-bearing algae, in which endosymbiont-to-host DNA transfer is on-going and for which endosymbiont/plastid origins can be inferred at a fine taxonomic scale. Here, we report two previously undescribed dinoflagellates, strains MGD and TGD, with green algal endosymbionts enclosing plastids as well as relic nuclei (nucleomorphs). We provide evidence for the presence of DNA in the two nucleomorphs and the transfer of endosymbiont genes to the host (dinoflagellate) genomes. Furthermore, DNA transfer between the host and endosymbiont nuclei was found to be in progress in both the MGD and TGD systems. Phylogenetic analyses successfully resolved the origins of the endosymbionts at the genus level. With the combined evidence, we conclude that the host-endosymbiont integration in MGD/TGD is less advanced than that in cryptophytes/chrorarachniophytes, and propose the two dinoflagellates as models for elucidating organellogenesis.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlastidSymbiosisCell NucleusCercozoaChlorophytaCryptophytaDinoflagellidaModels, BiologicalPhylogenyPlastidsendosymbiotic gene transfernucleomorphPedinophyceaeplastidsecondary endosymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID32094181
PMCPMC7071878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.