Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32094055›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Women's Postabortion Contraceptive Preferences and Access to Family Planning Services in Mississippi.

Kari White, Kaitlin J Portz, Samantha Whitfield, Sacheen Nathan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Barriers to Preferred Contraception Use in Mississippi.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reproductive Health Services in Abortion-Providing Clinics: A Scoping Review of Provision and Policy Contexts.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kari WhiteSteve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Population Research Center and the Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Electronic address: kariwhite@utexas.edu.
Kaitlin J PortzDepartment of Health Care Organization & Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Samantha WhitfieldDepartment of Health Care Organization & Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Sacheen NathanJackson Women's Health Organization, Jackson, Mississippi.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USJackson Memorial Hospital · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen's preferences for postabortion contraceptive care vary, and some may experience difficulties realizing their preferences owing to health systems-level barriers. We assessed Mississippi women's interest in postabortion contraceptive counseling and method use and the extent to which their method preferences were met.

methodsIn 2016, women ages 18 to 45 completed a self-administered survey at their abortion consultation visit in Mississippi and a follow-up phone survey 4-8 weeks later. Thirty-eight participants were selected for in-depth interviews. We computed the percentage of women who were interested in contraceptive counseling, initiating a method, and who obtained a method at the clinic. We also calculated the percentage who were using their preferred method after abortion and the main reasons they were not using this method. We analyzed transcripts using a theme-based approach.

resultsOf 323 women enrolled, 222 (69%) completed the follow-up survey. Of those completing follow-up, more than one-half (58%) reported that their consultation or abortion visit was the best time for contraceptive counseling, and 69% wanted to initiate contraception at the clinic. Only 10% obtained a method on site, and in-depth interview respondents reported they could not afford or did not like the options available. At the follow-up survey, 23% of respondents were using their preferred method. Women cited cost or lack of insurance coverage and difficulties scheduling appointments with community clinicians as reasons for not using their preferred method.

conclusionsMississippi women have a large unmet demand for postabortion contraception. Policies that support on-site provision of contraception at abortion facilities would help women to realize their contraceptive preferences.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAdolescentAdultAftercareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCohort StudiesContraceptionContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedMississippiPregnancyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32094055
PMCPMC10859164
OpenAlexW3008752868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.