Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32093982›Full record

Observational studyVaccine2020

Chinese social media suggest decreased vaccine acceptance in China: An observational study on Weibo following the 2018 Changchun Changsheng vaccine incident.

Dian Hu, Christine Martin, Mark Dredze, David A Broniatowski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06405048 (Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Mock-up Fact-checking Extension to Improve Ability to Debunk HPV Vaccine Misinformation Among Parents of Middle School Girls), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06405048 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Mock-up Fact-checking Extension to Improve Ability to Debunk HPV Vaccine Misinformation Among Parents of Middle School Girls: A Survey Experiment

TypeinterventionalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled1,200ConditionsHPV VaccineArmsMobile Weibo post screenshot with mock-up Chinese fact-checking extension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trust in scientists on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccine intention in China and the US.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dian HuThe George Washington University, Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: hudian@gwu.edu.
Christine MartinThe Johns Hopkins University, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC, United States.
Mark DredzeThe Johns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science, Baltimore, MD, United States.
David A BroniatowskiThe George Washington University, Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Washington, DC, United States; Institute for Data, Democracy, and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

Supplementing Survey-Based Analyses of Group Vaccination Narratives and Behaviors Using Social MediaR01GM114771 · NIGMS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRONIATOWSKI, DAVID ANDRE, QUINN, SANDRA CROUSE · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China is home to the world's largest population, with the potential for disease outbreaks to affect billions. However, knowledge of Chinese vaccine acceptance trends is limited. In this work we use Chinese social media to track responses to the recent Changchun Changsheng Biotechnology vaccine scandal, which led to extensive discussion regarding vaccine safety and regulation in China. We analyzed messages from the popular Chinese microblogging platform Sina Weibo in July 2018 (n = 11,085), and August 2019 (n = 500). Thus, we consider Chinese vaccine acceptance, before, during, immediately after, and one year after the scandal occurred. Results show that expressions of distrust in government pertaining to vaccines increased significantly during and immediately after the scandal. Self-reports of vaccination occurred both before, and one year after, the scandal; however, these self-reports changed from positive endorsements of vaccination to concerns about vaccine harms. Data suggest that expressed support for vaccine acceptance in China may be decreasing.

Indexed as

Social MediaChinaHumansVaccinationVaccination RefusalVaccinesVaccinesChangchun ChangshengChina vaccine incidentSocial mediaVaccine acceptanceVaccine safetyWeibo

Identifiers

PMID32093982
PMCPMC7211271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.