Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32093729›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2020

Outcomes of surgical resection for gastric cancer liver metastases: a retrospective analysis.

Kenji Kawahara, Hironobu Makino, Hisashi Kametaka, Isamu Hoshino, Tadaomi Fukada, Kazuhiro Seike, Yohei Kawasaki, Masayuki Otsuka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Influence of cancer-directed surgery on the prognosis of liver metastases from gastric cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kenji KawaharaDepartment of Surgery, Odawara Municipal Hospital, 46 Kuno, Odawara City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. axha4717@chiba-u.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1557-2928
Hironobu MakinoDepartment of Surgery, Odawara Municipal Hospital, 46 Kuno, Odawara City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
Hisashi KametakaDepartment of Surgery, Odawara Municipal Hospital, 46 Kuno, Odawara City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
Isamu HoshinoDepartment of General Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2, Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba Prefecture, Japan.
Tadaomi FukadaDepartment of Surgery, Odawara Municipal Hospital, 46 Kuno, Odawara City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
Kazuhiro SeikeDepartment of Surgery, Odawara Municipal Hospital, 46 Kuno, Odawara City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
Yohei KawasakiBiostatistics Section, Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba Prefecture, Japan.
Masayuki OtsukaDepartment f General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba Prefecture, Japan.
Odawara Municipal Hospital · JPChiba Cancer Center · JPChiba University · JPChiba University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe indications for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLMs) remain controversial. In addition, the outcome of surgery for the treatment of liver metastases of alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer (AFP-GC) has not yet been reported. We assessed the clinicopathologic features, including AFP-GC, and the surgical results of these patients.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 20 patients who underwent hepatectomy for GCLM at Odawara Municipal Hospital between April 2006 and January 2016.

resultsThe actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after primary hepatectomy were 80.0%, 55.5%, and 31.7%, respectively, with a median OS of 42 months. Four patients survived for more than 5 years after their final hepatectomy procedures. A multivariate analysis showed multiple metastases in the liver, the elevated level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and an age of less than 70 years to be independently associated with a poor prognosis in terms of OS. No significant differences were noted between the AFP-GC and AFP-negative GC groups.

conclusionSurgical treatment is therefore considered to be a feasible option for GCLM. The findings of the present study showed the number of metastatic liver tumors, the level of CA19-9, and the patient age to be prognostic indicators for the surgical treatment of GCLM.

Indexed as

GastrectomyHepatectomyAgedAged, 80 and overAge Factorsalpha-FetoproteinsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateDisease-Free SurvivalFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastric MucosaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleAFP protein, humanalpha-FetoproteinsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydratecarbohydrate antigen 199, humanAlpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancerGastric cancerHepatectomyLiver metastasesMetastasis

Identifiers

PMID32093729
PMCPMC7038617
OpenAlexW3011631302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.